Should the following commits should be included for 3.2 specially BB10
changes?
* d5e4e9e CB-5307 Remove references to Callback and Incubator
* 9740276 CB-5253 remove webworksready event
* 6568e94 CB-5253 remove webworks.exec
* 9bbf2b7 CB-5247 [BlackBerry10] Map blackberry.event to document
* 4e2e
Blackberry and Android would need to get retagged. I have no issue with
retagging the JS in-regards to firefoxos. Other platform maintainers can
chime in.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Carlos Santana wrote:
> Should the following commits should be included for 3.2 specially BB10
> changes?
>
+1
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
> Blackberry and Android would need to get retagged. I have no issue with
> retagging the JS in-regards to firefoxos. Other platform maintainers can
> chime in.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Carlos Santana
> wrote:
>
> > Should the
I am a plus one, if these items are intended to be in 3.2.0.
Technically, all platforms should be updated so they are all built from the
same git commit.
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Shazron wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Steven Gill
> wrote:
Alright, lets do it. Carlos, you want to retag the JS?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jesse wrote:
> I am a plus one, if these items are intended to be in 3.2.0.
>
> Technically, all platforms should be updated so they are all built from the
> same git commit.
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
Steve can you go ahead merge amd retag I'm out right now on a cfa meeting.
--Carlos
On Thursday, November 7, 2013, Steven Gill wrote:
> Alright, lets do it. Carlos, you want to retag the JS?
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jesse >
> wrote:
>
> > I am a plus one, if these items are intended
Alright I got this.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Carlos Santana wrote:
> Steve can you go ahead merge amd retag I'm out right now on a cfa meeting.
>
> --Carlos
>
> On Thursday, November 7, 2013, Steven Gill wrote:
>
> > Alright, lets do it. Carlos, you want to retag the JS?
> >
> >
> > On T
cordova-js has been retagged
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
> Alright I got this.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Carlos Santana wrote:
>
>> Steve can you go ahead merge amd retag I'm out right now on a cfa meeting.
>>
>> --Carlos
>>
>> On Thursday, November 7, 2013, S
Carlos wrote:
> Should the following commits should be included for 3.2 specially BB10
> changes?
On the subject of changes designed for 3.2, this set (for CCB-5258) is the only
thing I have that I really want to get it in:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/70
https://github.com/apache
Sweet. None of these require re-tagging cordova-js.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Josh Soref wrote:
> Carlos wrote:
> > Should the following commits should be included for 3.2 specially
> BB10 changes?
>
> On the subject of changes designed for 3.2, this set (for CCB-5258) is the
> only thing
Thank you Steve !
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
> Sweet. None of these require re-tagging cordova-js.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Josh Soref wrote:
>
> > Carlos wrote:
> > > Should the following commits should be included for 3.2 specially
> > BB10 changes?
> >
>
And the js commits for blackberry did not change the js for other platforms!
Win win.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 6:56 PM, Carlos Santana wrote:
>
> Thank you Steve !
>
>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
>>
>> Sweet. None of these require re-tagging cordo
currently testing BB, should be retagged in about 10 minutes
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:59 PM, purplecabbage wrote:
> And the js commits for blackberry did not change the js for other
> platforms! Win win.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Nov 7, 2013, at 6:56 PM, Carlos Santana wrote:
> >
> > Than
BB has been retagged, fixed an issue which blocked plugin installation.
Core is ready, but there are major issues with multiple plugins.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Lorin Beer wrote:
> currently testing BB, should be retagged in about 10 minutes
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:59 PM, purplec
Thanks Lorin.
I'll take a look this weekend. Plugin installation has been working
correctly without the blank permissions element for a while now. I did not
experience any issues with plugins when I tagged earlier this week.
On Friday, November 8, 2013, Lorin Beer wrote:
> BB has been retagged,
well, I had an updated version of plugman and I checked at multiple tags.
I'll do some more investigation.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Bryan Higgins wrote:
> Thanks Lorin.
>
> I'll take a look this weekend. Plugin installation has been working
> correctly without the blank permissions elemen
16 matches
Mail list logo