On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Mark Hammond wrote:
> On 26/02/2010 4:22 AM, Juhani Ränkimies wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There's a new variation of the file versioning scheme and I'd
>> appreciate if you'd check it out.
>>
>> Binary: http://github.com/juranki/couchdb/downloads
>> Source: http://githu
On 25/02/2010 10:38 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
Might want to get this fixed for the release Mark.
The release artefact should have an sha1 and md5 hash in the same directory.
OK, done. I modified the build script to create the .sha file, and also
to arrange so both the sha and md5 files referenc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Anderson closed COUCHDB-673.
--
Resolution: Fixed
committed in r916518
Thanks Filipe!
> Filtered replication
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12838618#action_12838618
]
Chris Anderson commented on COUCHDB-549:
this is just a failure to push the confli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12838614#action_12838614
]
Jens Alfke commented on COUCHDB-549:
This actually goes back to 0.10.0.
>From some his
On 26/02/2010 4:22 AM, Juhani Ränkimies wrote:
Hi,
There's a new variation of the file versioning scheme and I'd
appreciate if you'd check it out.
Binary: http://github.com/juranki/couchdb/downloads
Source: http://github.com/juranki/couchdb
I'm not sure exactly what you are asking me to check
Send $1 to nsla...@tumbolia.org and I will cut it.
On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:13, Randall Leeds wrote:
> +1
> Cut it!
>
> On Feb 25, 2010 12:08 PM, "Paul Davis" wrote:
>
>> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are good
> candidates for 1.0.
> +1
+1
Cut it!
On Feb 25, 2010 12:08 PM, "Paul Davis" wrote:
> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are good
candidates for 1.0.
+1
> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are good
> candidates for 1.0.
+1
Have you self-appointed as a wiki gnome? If so, wonderful! Thank you.
Maybe one of the first things you could do is set up a wiki gnome page, and
form a team of go-to people for the wiki.
Nothing like knowing the people doing most of the work in one area, forming a
bit of a community around it.
On Feb 25, 2010, at 2:07 AM, Li Zhengji wrote:
> I have just worked out a patch on branch 0.11.x.
>
Awesome, if you can put it onto Jira here, we'll review it:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB
Thanks,
Chris
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> Do you hav
Hey couch-devs,
I identified "security" as an imported topic that needs some (more) attention
in the wiki (there has been a bunch of new features in this area recently).
Unfortunately I have only minimal knowledge of CouchDB's security concepts (and
even less what feature is available in which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12838447#action_12838447
]
Filipe Manana commented on COUCHDB-673:
---
Forgot to mention: JS explicit tests added
On Feb 25, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 25 Feb 2010, at 04:43, Robert Newson wrote:
>
>> I second this emotion. :)
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Randall Leeds
>> wrote:
>>> See my last comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597
>>>
>>> I would <3 <
info-message contains invalid URL when using IPv6
-
Key: COUCHDB-672
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-672
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.10
I second this emotion. :)
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> See my last comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597
>
> I would <3 <3 <3 to see this make it.
>
If not asking too much,
I would also like to see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-639in 0.11.
It's a follow up to the attachment compression feature and also fixes the
problem with push replication when docs have large attachments (ticket 163
related also).
cheers
On Thu, Feb 25, 20
On 25 February 2010 11:35, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> And I just this morning noticed a request from Matt Goodall about 0.11 Futon
> storage.
The Futon Storage issue, COUCHDB-668, is fixed in master/trunk.
The one I'm really concerned about now is COUCHDB-671 [1], "Futon
changes data when starting
Might want to get this fixed for the release Mark.
The release artefact should have an sha1 and md5 hash in the same directory.
Check the Verifying Releases section here:
http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.html
Your files will need to pass this.
On 25 Feb 2010, at 03:37, Mark Hammond wrote:
And I just this morning noticed a request from Matt Goodall about 0.11 Futon
storage.
On 25 Feb 2010, at 10:06, Randall Leeds wrote:
> See my last comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597
>
> I would <3 <3 <3 to see this make it.
Futon changes data when starting to edit
Key: COUCHDB-671
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-671
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Futon
Affects Versions: 0.11
On 25 February 2010 10:31, Matt Goodall wrote:
> On 23 February 2010 16:57, Matt Goodall wrote:
>
>> On 23 February 2010 16:35, Matt Goodall wrote:
>>
>>> On 23 February 2010 16:20, Christopher Lenz wrote:
>>>
Hi Matt,
On 23.02.2010, at 14:25, Matt Goodall wrote:
> 2. Impli
On 23 February 2010 16:57, Matt Goodall wrote:
> On 23 February 2010 16:35, Matt Goodall wrote:
>
>> On 23 February 2010 16:20, Christopher Lenz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Matt,
>>>
>>> On 23.02.2010, at 14:25, Matt Goodall wrote:
>>> > 2. Implicit type conversion. Doc attribute values are now implicitly
I have just worked out a patch on branch 0.11.x.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> Do you have a patch to add that behaviour? :)
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
--
Li Zhengji
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Randall Leeds updated COUCHDB-597:
--
Attachment: couchdb_597.patch
I believe this patch fixes most of the problems we're seeing her
See my last comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597
I would <3 <3 <3 to see this make it.
J Chris Anderson wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2010, at 1:42 AM, Andrew Straw wrote:
>
>> So far, so good. But now, I can't execute the view, even as admin:
>>
>> curl http://astraw:abc...@127.0.0.1:5984/cooldb/_design/example/_view/foo
>> {"error":"unauthorized","reason":"You are not authorized to acces
27 matches
Mail list logo