[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12883706#action_12883706
]
Chris Anderson commented on COUCHDB-393:
Benoit's patch looks good to me. I'd be h
>
> Sorry I didn't see this patch before I implemented a continuous = true
> checkbox (see trunk now) if your patch is preferable then we can swap it for
> mine. Should I take the time to apply and test, or is Trunk good?
>
Oh noes! :) Seriously though, that's good. Just close #489
Cheers,
--
On Jun 29, 2010, at 11:41 AM, David Coallier wrote:
> On 29 June 2010 18:41, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
>> On Jun 29, 2010, at 10:20 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> For trunk, I think there are a couple of small patches that Adam wants to
>>> hold back for 1.1.
>>
>> Not a big deal, everything
On 29 June 2010 18:41, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 10:20 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>
>> For trunk, I think there are a couple of small patches that Adam wants to
>> hold back for 1.1.
>
> Not a big deal, everything I committed to trunk is pretty stable and tested
> in productio
On Jun 29, 2010, at 10:20 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
> For trunk, I think there are a couple of small patches that Adam wants to
> hold back for 1.1.
Not a big deal, everything I committed to trunk is pretty stable and tested in
production. I tagged those commits as 1.1 because they weren't s
On 29 Jun 2010, at 16:40, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Noah was suggesting to give this info from couch-s, but it's not an
> easy patch and could wait next release imo. What is the deadline
> before couch 1.0 ? Shouldn't we wait for erlang R14B and then having
> ful support for windows version ? Or
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:20 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 2010, at 7:00 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>>
>> That's correct Mark. Trunk is what you want (although there are a few
>> patches that might not make 1.0)
>>
>> I plan to start a thread for what to keep back for 1.
If we're branching and tagging from trunk, then trunk.
On 29 Jun 2010, at 15:48, till wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>> On 29 Jun 2010, at 15:20, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> So I went through both trunk and 0.11.x looking for things that are out of
>>> plac
On Jun 29, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> Please can everyone check that "make distcheck" is working for them.
>
> Let's try to avoid the test failures again for this release.
`make distcheck` failed with a list of all the .patch files and stuff laying
around my CouchDB trunk checko
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 29 Jun 2010, at 15:20, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>
>> So I went through both trunk and 0.11.x looking for things that are out of
>> place. I fixed one small thing in 0.11.x, and as far as I'm concerned it is
>> ready for release.
>>
>> For
On 29 Jun 2010, at 15:20, J Chris Anderson wrote:
> So I went through both trunk and 0.11.x looking for things that are out of
> place. I fixed one small thing in 0.11.x, and as far as I'm concerned it is
> ready for release.
>
> For trunk, I think there are a couple of small patches that Adam
On Jun 26, 2010, at 7:00 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
> [snip]
>
> That's correct Mark. Trunk is what you want (although there are a few patches
> that might not make 1.0)
>
> I plan to start a thread for what to keep back for 1.1 and a thread for
> anything that should be un-backported from 0
12 matches
Mail list logo
