On 23 January 2011 00:17, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> On 21 January 2011 04:06, Paul Davis wrote:
>> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
>>
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/
>>
>> These artifacts have been bu
On 20 Jan 2011, at 15:06, Paul Davis wrote:
> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
+1
Hashes and signature: ok
Comparison with source tag: ok
Updated release files: ok
Successful build: ok
Futon tests: ok
DOIT
Is there any update on this issue?
Seeing as the tests are passing for everyone else for everything as
well as the fact that these are the tests that fail when you try
running make check with CouchDB running I'll assume it was just that
for now.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman
My +1 as well.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Sebastian Cohnen
wrote:
> +1
>
> signatures ok,
> make check ok,
> browser test suite ok (safari + firefox)
>
> on OS X 10.6.6, Erlang R14B01
>
> On 20.01.2011, at 16:06, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> This is the third release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.0.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986592#action_12986592
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-462:
---
Unless I'm reading that wrong, it l
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Filipe David Manana
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>> I would suggest 3 or 5 retry. because at the end it make a process
>> that waited for
>>
>> 5 + 5000 + 5 + 50
>
> Benôit, I think you didn't get it right. It's
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> I would suggest 3 or 5 retry. because at the end it make a process
> that waited for
>
> 5 + 5000 + 5 + 50
Benôit, I think you didn't get it right. It's like:
5, 10, 20, 40, 80, ...
It doubles.
I'll make the number of retr
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>
>>> On 25 Jan 2011, at 18:54, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Filipe David Manana
w
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> On 25 Jan 2011, at 18:54, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Filipe David Manana
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Benoit Chesneau
>>>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 25 Jan 2011, at 18:54, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Filipe David Manana
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Benoit Chesneau
>>> wrote:
shouldn't MAX_RETRY be a config setting ?
On 25 Jan 2011, at 18:54, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Filipe David Manana
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>>
>>> shouldn't MAX_RETRY be a config setting ?
>>>
>>
>> If there are many people who wish the value for MAX_RETRIES
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986552#action_12986552
]
Bob Dionne commented on COUCHDB-462:
Paul,
good suggestion. Here's a version that
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Filipe David Manana
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>> shouldn't MAX_RETRY be a config setting ?
>>
>
> If there are many people who wish the value for MAX_RETRIES to be
> configurable, then yes. Only left as a constant to avoid
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Filipe David Manana
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>> Is there any reason you are using named table here ? Why not just use
>> ets ids ? Also why using macros ?
>>
>
> Yes. Not using the IDs returned by ets:new/2 because that m
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2011, at 7:40 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Benoit Chesneau
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Imo the thing we could have in view, except this plugin "support", is
>>> a simple api to call any part of cou
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> shouldn't MAX_RETRY be a config setting ?
>
If there are many people who wish the value for MAX_RETRIES to be
configurable, then yes. Only left as a constant to avoid increasing
the size of our .ini configuration.
--
Filipe David Man
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> Is there any reason you are using named table here ? Why not just use
> ets ids ? Also why using macros ?
>
Yes. Not using the IDs returned by ets:new/2 because that means saving
them in the state and having to pass them to every helper
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:46 PM, wrote:
> Author: fdmanana
> Date: Mon Jan 24 13:46:11 2011
> New Revision: 1062772
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062772&view=rev
> Log:
> Refactoring of the replicator database listener
>
> Simpler implementation and more reliable behaviour when the r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986533#action_12986533
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-759:
-
The current jail code only check relati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benoit Chesneau reassigned COUCHDB-759:
---
Assignee: Benoit Chesneau
> rewriter should be securely jailed in a single database
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:09 PM, wrote:
> Author: fdmanana
> Date: Mon Jan 24 14:09:06 2011
> New Revision: 1062783
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062783&view=rev
> Log:
> Replicator DB: on restart, make several attempts to restart the replications
>
> Now on restart, the replicator d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986504#action_12986504
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-462:
---
@Bob2
But for a "status of databas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986498#action_12986498
]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-462:
---
One concern. "Oh, I have 10 conflicts! Whic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986492#action_12986492
]
Adam Kocoloski commented on COUCHDB-462:
Ah, good point Paul. I think counting th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986489#action_12986489
]
Benjamin Young commented on COUCHDB-1038:
-
This comment on the Futon2 ticket (#95
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986485#action_12986485
]
Benjamin Young commented on COUCHDB-950:
Because it was so wonderfully easy to do,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986466#action_12986466
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-462:
---
OMG WHITESPACE CHANGES!
The one th
Yep. Looks like a bug. I'll get to it eventually if no one beats me to
it. Hint hint.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Martin Hilbig wrote:
> On 24.01.2011 22:30, Paul Davis wrote:
>>
>> I think more likely its that 12-12345 fails to parse as a correct
>> revision and the error gets confused as i
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Benjamin Young (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986443#action_12986443
> ]
>
> Benjamin Young commented on COUCHDB-950:
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986443#action_12986443
]
Benjamin Young commented on COUCHDB-950:
Another option is to symlink the www dire
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986439#action_12986439
]
Bob Dionne commented on COUCHDB-462:
We have a new approach to surfacing conflict coun
Needs more information about running replications
-
Key: COUCHDB-1040
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1040
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Repl
32 matches
Mail list logo
