On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 05:22, Jason Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Randall Leeds
>> wrote:
>>> Either
>>> these things have a proper place in the sequential history of a
>>> database or they do not. That there are things
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 05:22, Jason Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Randall Leeds
> wrote:
>> Either
>> these things have a proper place in the sequential history of a
>> database or they do not. That there are things which affect update_seq
>> but do not appear in the by_seq in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13176306#comment-13176306
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-1371:
+1
> configure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13176280#comment-13176280
]
Randall Leeds commented on COUCHDB-1371:
I hope there does come a time when we d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13176267#comment-13176267
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-1371:
While I understand your general
What's interesting is that modulo one edge case, last_seq in the changes feed
and update_seq in the db_info record are exactly as defined on the WIKI.
update_seq:
Current number of updates to the database (int)
last_seq:
last_seq is the sequence number of the last update returned. (Currently
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> Yes it does. There is mostly consistent relationship between update
> sequence (seq, update_seq, last_seq, committed_seq) and the by_seq
> index. It seems entirely too confusing that there are things which
> affect update_seq but do not appea
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Current implementation of browserid is worthless imo
Indeed.
> It's good to show how it could work,
Cue Inigo Montoya.
--
Iris Couch
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 22:02, Jason Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Michiel de Jong
>> wrote:
>>> The other thing, CouchDB as a BrowserId RP, would simply be instead of
>>> clicking 'login' at the bottom right in futon, t
