On 26 March 2012 01:31, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> On 25 March 2012 09:32, Paul Davis wrote:
>> I've not looked into this thoroughly but has anyone thought to try
>> patching Erlang to use the newer openssl?
>
> No, and I'm pretty sure I'll come back scarred (but a better
> programmer) if I did th
having a member of _users create new users does not work
Key: COUCHDB-1450
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1450
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions
Alright, I managed to fix the machine. That is, I wiped it and the new
install works. :) I did some digging and it feels like a hiccup during
OS install caused the problem. Regardless, very unlikely that it was
CouchDB's problem.
All signatures and hashes look good.
`make check` ran without probl
On Mar 27, 2012, at 19:43 , Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> On 27 March 2012 17:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>> OMG OMG OMG
>>
>> *jumps up and down*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Excuse me.
>>
>> Jan
>
> I'm suitably impressed! What does this mean in practice, for devs and
> for committers?
It means we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13239794#comment-13239794
]
Wendall Cada commented on COUCHDB-1449:
---
This is a much better patch. Thanks Sam.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13239795#comment-13239795
]
Wendall Cada commented on COUCHDB-1449:
---
The Debian patch would need to be reworke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13239785#comment-13239785
]
Sam Bisbee commented on COUCHDB-1449:
-
FYI, this issue was found and resolved in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wendall Cada updated COUCHDB-1449:
--
Attachment: couchdb-0007-wait-for-couch-stop.patch
Correct patch.
> Couchdb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wendall Cada updated COUCHDB-1449:
--
Attachment: couchdb-0007-wait-for-couch-stop.patch
Patch to wait until process exits before r
Couchdb returns stopped status before process exits
---
Key: COUCHDB-1449
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1449
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.1.1, 1
On 27 March 2012 17:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> OMG OMG OMG
>
> *jumps up and down*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Excuse me.
>
> Jan
I'm suitably impressed! What does this mean in practice, for devs and
for committers?
A+
Dave
On 27 March 2012 14:19, Bob Dionne wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Actually the rules are quite clear on this issue:
>
> "However, in no case may someone's vote be considered invalid if the implied
> commitment doesn't appear to be met; a vote is a formal expression of
> opinion, not of commitment."
>
> Chee
Github user janl closed the pull request at
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/10
Github user janl closed the pull request at
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/11
Github user janl closed the pull request at
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/12
Github user janl closed the pull request at
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/13
Github user janl closed the pull request at
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/14
OMG OMG OMG
*jumps up and down*
Excuse me.
Jan
--
On Mar 27, 2012, at 17:10 , Git at Apache wrote:
> GitHub user janl opened the pull request at
> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/14
>
>
> Add empty line to test GitHub Pull Requests
>
> Let's see if this ends up on dev@.
>
>
Hey Jukka,
this is me testing out the new feature, sorry for being annoying I'm
just jumping-up-and-down-excited about it :)
I'll run one more to see if the mails get through to dev@ directly now.
Thanks *a lot* for driving this and the rest of the git integration,
it makes a great difference to
GitHub user janl opened the pull request at
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/14
Add empty line to test GitHub Pull Requests
Let's see if this ends up on dev@.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
$ git pull https://github.com/janl/couchdb test-gh-pr-t
Hi,
Another pull request notification that came in before I configured
automatic forwarding to dev@couchdb.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-- Forwarded message --
From: Git at Apache
Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:37 PM
Subject: couchdb pull request: Add empty line to test GitHub Pull Requ
Hi CouchDB devs,
See below for a GitHub pull request that came in earlier today.
I've added configuration that forwards any future pull request
notifications directly to dev@couchdb.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-- Forwarded message --
From: Git at Apache
Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:51
Dave,
Actually the rules are quite clear on this issue:
"However, in no case may someone's vote be considered invalid if the implied
commitment doesn't appear to be met; a vote is a formal expression of opinion,
not of commitment."
Cheers,
Bob
On Mar 27, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Dave Cottlehuber w
Man, I am so eager to remove the browser test suit. @__@
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Matt Goodall wrote:
> On 24 March 2012 17:39, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, third
> round.
> >
> > (I am calling this the "Haters Go
Also, everyone should vote, even if you've never spoken on this mailing
list before.
Every opinion is valuable, and is listened to.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> I disagree with this.
>
> It would be nice if people voting were able to assist, but the inability
> to assi
I disagree with this.
It would be nice if people voting were able to assist, but the inability to
assist SHOULD NOT prevent you from voting either way. If there are serious
issues with the release, I want to know about them, and I WILL abort the
vote for them.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Da
On 26 March 2012 23:52, Noah Slater wrote:
> As the person who's done the most tallying of votes over the last 4 years.
> I agree with Jan. Please leave your votes until you are reasonably sure
> they will not change. You CAN change them, but it is a PITA. Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 6:43
On 24 March 2012 17:39, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, third round.
>
> (I am calling this the "Haters Gon Hate" release.)
>
> Changes since last round:
>
> * COUCHDB-1424 fixed, thank you Bob Dionne
> * COUCHDB-1426 fixed, thank you
+1
Good build, make check, browser tests pass:
* Fedora 16, R15B
* Ubuntu 11.10, R15B
* Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, R15B
* OS X Lion, R15B
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, third round.
>
> (I am calling this th
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, third round.
>
> (I am calling this the "Haters Gon Hate" release.)
>
> Changes since last round:
>
> * COUCHDB-1424 fixed, thank you Bob Dionne
> * COUCHDB-1426 fixed, t
MD5, SHA1 and signature check OK, make check passes, Futon test suite
passes (although replicator_db took a couple of attempts).
Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Spidermonkey 1.8.5, Erlang R15B.
+1 from me.
On 24 March 2012 17:39, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache Couc
31 matches
Mail list logo
