[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661086#comment-13661086
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on COUCHDB-1783:
--
Com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1368:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.3.1
> multipart/related document body doesn't identify which par
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661038#comment-13661038
]
Dave Cottlehuber commented on COUCHDB-1368:
---
+1 for 1.3.1; arguably the abilit
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Not sure, Randal. Dave was asking similar things on IRC today.
>
> We need to drive that to conclusion. (Unfortunately, I'm not your man for
> that. Git is not my wheelhouse.)
>
>
> On 17 May 2013 19:59, Randall Leeds wrote:
>
>> Where are we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1639:
--
Priority: Minor (was: Blocker)
> doc_to_multi_part_stream does not include heade
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1639:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.3.1
> doc_to_multi_part_stream does not include headers for atta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1639:
--
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> doc_to_multi_part_stream does not include heade
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1368:
--
Priority: Blocker (was: Minor)
> multipart/related document body doesn't identif
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber updated COUCHDB-1493:
--
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> null byte in string data dropped
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13660999#comment-13660999
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on COUCHDB-1784:
--
Com
Not sure, Randal. Dave was asking similar things on IRC today.
We need to drive that to conclusion. (Unfortunately, I'm not your man for
that. Git is not my wheelhouse.)
On 17 May 2013 19:59, Randall Leeds wrote:
> Where are we with merge procedure? What's the workflow we want to see
> for mas
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Robert Newson wrote:
> oldDoc is null in this case. That matches the case that the doc is
> brand new and is surely deliberate? I asked him to post it this here
> because I do understand the benefits of it being otherwise and wanted
> to see this conversation.
>
>
yay! congratz!
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has
> elected Dirkjan Ochtman as a CouchDB committer.
>
> Apache ID: djc
>
> IRC nick: djc
>
> Twitter: @djco
>
> By default,
Where are we with merge procedure? What's the workflow we want to see
for master -> 1.3.1?
1.3.1 is cut from 1.3.x I assume. But you asked a lot of questions
about how to make it easier to see the differences.
The best I could come up with to satisfy your question would have been
to insist that *
oldDoc is null in this case. That matches the case that the doc is
brand new and is surely deliberate? I asked him to post it this here
because I do understand the benefits of it being otherwise and wanted
to see this conversation.
My position is that deleting a document should free that id for an
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Jim Klo wrote:
> So Bob suggested that I raise this topic over here… Attaching the relevant
> thread from user@ here.
>
> I suppose this is a feature request to be able to optionally enable the
> passing of the document "stub" as the oldDoc, if exists to the VDU,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13660945#comment-13660945
]
Dave Cottlehuber commented on COUCHDB-1784:
---
Looks like I'm still missing some
>
> I'd prefer to have quality docs in the source code / .rst files if
> possible. Wikis are ok for evolving stuff but if it's actually usage of
> CouchDB proper, in the source is the way to go. You get history directly
> tied to source code / release versions for free too.
>
I love having the man
On 17 May 2013 18:34, Robert Newson wrote:
> So that's a lot better now, except for R16 which we knew..
Did we? Mmm it shouldn't fail on that, did I miss some travis-specific
thingummie?
A+D
So Bob suggested that I raise this topic over here… Attaching the relevant
thread from user@ here.
I suppose this is a feature request to be able to optionally enable the passing
of the document "stub" as the oldDoc, if exists to the VDU, if the design doc
contains a flag to enable this behavio
So that's a lot better now, except for R16 which we knew..
On 17 May 2013 17:25, Robert Newson wrote:
> Let's try to fix it. I've made a start.
>
> On 17 May 2013 14:28, Garren Smith wrote:
>> I'm in favour of turning it off unless its really easy to fix.
>>
>>
>> On 17 May 2013, at 3:26 PM, Noa
Let's try to fix it. I've made a start.
On 17 May 2013 14:28, Garren Smith wrote:
> I'm in favour of turning it off unless its really easy to fix.
>
>
> On 17 May 2013, at 3:26 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> See this:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/60
>>
>>> Failed — Th
Congrats Dirkjan.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> congratulations Dirkjan!
>
> On 17 May 2013 13:39, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Dear community,
> >
> > I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee
> has
> > elected Dirkjan Ochtman as a CouchDB c
congratulations Dirkjan!
On 17 May 2013 13:39, Noah Slater wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has
> elected Dirkjan Ochtman as a CouchDB committer.
>
> Apache ID: djc
>
> IRC nick: djc
>
> Twitter: @djco
>
> By default,
Welcome :)
On 05/17/2013 04:39 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has
elected Dirkjan Ochtman as a CouchDB committer.
Apache ID: djc
IRC nick: djc
Twitter: @djco
By default, external contributions to t
This sounds like a great initiative. Anyone interested in coordinating this?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jim Jagielski
Date: 17 May 2013 14:11
Subject: Grace Hopper Open Source Day
To: "memb...@apache.org"
Cc: Apache Board
I am forwarding this email on behalf of Leslie Hawth
I'm in favour of turning it off unless its really easy to fix.
On 17 May 2013, at 3:26 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> See this:
>
> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/60
>
>> Failed — The Travis CI build failed (Details)
>
> It's it's current state, Travis CI is meaningless. It
Hi devs,
See this:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/60
> Failed — The Travis CI build failed (Details)
It's it's current state, Travis CI is meaningless. It fails 50% of the time
or more.
I'm fed up of the bogus emails it sends me, and I think it's sending the
wrong message to people wh
Friendly bump.
NEWS and CHANGES are still empty.
I'll be calling the vote on 1.3.1 in 12 days, so y'all better get your
changes in pronto! ;)
On 15 May 2013 07:24, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> On 15 May 2013 06:17, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> > On May 15, 2013 12:06 AM, "Dave Cottlehuber" wrote:
Welcome :)
On 17 May 2013 12:42, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> welcome :)
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Garren Smith wrote:
>> Congrats Dirkjan thats awesome.
>>
>> On 17 May 2013, at 1:39 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>>> Dear community,
>>>
>>> I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project
welcome :)
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Garren Smith wrote:
> Congrats Dirkjan thats awesome.
>
> On 17 May 2013, at 1:39 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Dear community,
>>
>> I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has
>> elected Dirkjan Ochtman as a CouchDB commi
Congrats Dirkjan thats awesome.
On 17 May 2013, at 1:39 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has
> elected Dirkjan Ochtman as a CouchDB committer.
>
>Apache ID: djc
>
>IRC nick: djc
>
>Twitter: @djco
>
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has
elected Dirkjan Ochtman as a CouchDB committer.
Apache ID: djc
IRC nick: djc
Twitter: @djco
By default, external contributions to the project follow the
Review-Then-Commit model. Being a comm
GitHub user unclespode opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/60
Update jquery.couch.js
In the original code, if there was an error doing the long poll, it would
wait 100ms and then try again. If it errors again, it doubles to 200ms. If it
errors again, it do
34 matches
Mail list logo
