[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13890370#comment-13890370
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-2045:
IIRC we need to avoid linking a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13890314#comment-13890314
]
Alexander Shorin commented on COUCHDB-2044:
---
I just leave this there: https://
Russell Branca created COUCHDB-2045:
---
Summary: Trace trap error while starting CouchDB
Key: COUCHDB-2045
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2045
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type
Github user BigBlueHat closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/143
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13889921#comment-13889921
]
Adam Kocoloski commented on COUCHDB-2044:
-
Seems like a solid idea. If I have N
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Alexander Thayer updated COUCHDB-2044:
-
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Wish)
> Plugin to Review and Res
Maximilian Alexander Thayer created COUCHDB-2044:
Summary: Plugin to Review and Resolve Conflicts
Key: COUCHDB-2044
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2044
Project: Couc
Benoit,
Sorry if I gave you that impression. I read your mail in full, and
take on board all of your points. I just don't want to drag this out
into a needlessly long discussion that tires people out.
We do a lot of *talking* in this project. It would be nice if we could
make decisions quicker an
I forgot to answer to one of your other concern, but I am totally agree
with the fact that contributors don't have to be a developer or whatever.
Which doesn't mean they should have a dedicated ml. Not developing and
following devs are 2 different things.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Benoit Ch
Noah,
I wonder why I took the time to elaborate on that topic to see all my
concerns and *objections* properly ignored just because you don't care
about what does the others (which had a known and accepted success in their
strategy) or because you just disagree without giving much reason. I would
GitHub user BigBlueHat opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/143
Css loading fix
`Gruntfile.js` was processing the LESS files in according to the order in
`settings.json` but then concatenating the CSS files alphabetically from the
filesystem. So LESS/CSS wa
That's certainly an option. The only ML it wouldn't work for is private@.
On 3 February 2014 15:54, Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
>
> To reduce the burden of moderation, can we not reject messages from those not
> subscribed, with instructions on how to subscribe? I hear you that you'd
> rather n
To reduce the burden of moderation, can we not reject messages from those not
subscribed, with instructions on how to subscribe? I hear you that you’d rather
not do so, but I think it’s reasonable. If the volume of false negatives is
much lower, more folks might elect to become moderators. I kn
Usually people who are not subscribed from some reason. These are
important mails that need to be let through. Whether legitimate users
who forgot to subscribe, or Apache members who are notifying us of
things. Occasionally, someone from a company like Cloudant replies to
thread which may have made
Benoit,
This is a notice that I am going to assume lazy consensus on the
proposal to create a marketing@ list. If you have a formal objection
to raise, please do so now, and I will move this to a vote.
We have the following lists:
erlang@ - Created specifically to create "safe space" for people
Noah,
The 1 in 10 that need letting through are for folks sending from outside or
folks that are subscribed but triggered a spam filter?
B.
On 3 Feb 2014, at 14:16, Noah Slater wrote:
> We have moderators. I am fed up of moderating them. I want to know
> there are other people available to do
We have moderators. I am fed up of moderating them. I want to know
there are other people available to do this. Thanks for the people
who've volunteered so far. I'll add people in a few days.
About 1 in 10 emails are valid and need letting through.
On 3 February 2014 06:52, Paul Davis wrote:
> D
I dunno Benoit. Perhaps ask someone from the Infra team, or another
project using it.
On 3 February 2014 08:53, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>> P.S. Your Review Board account is not linked to LDAP. You'll have to
>> sign up for an account.
>>
You could ask Infra about the URL!
On 3 February 2014 08:08, Garren Smith wrote:
> This is great. Is it possible to create a nice url like wiki.couchdb.com for
> it?
>
>
> On 02 Feb 2014, at 10:04 PM, Andy Wenk wrote:
>
>> Super cool! Do you want us to do anything right now? As I understood yo
Github user andywenk closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/142
Github user andywenk closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/139
GitHub user andywenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/142
added documentation fixes
made the deletion of a document clearer and
fixed some wording in the JSON structure tables
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ g
I'd be in favour of keeping the number of lists small until it becomes clear
that some topic needs to spin off into its own list. While the volume of
marketing emails is low, it's not hard for devs who aren't that interested in
marketing to ignore them, just as those who aren't interested in spe
On 3 February 2014 10:46, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
>
>> On 3 February 2014 10:14, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
>>>
On 3 February 2014 08:42, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
> On 3 February 2014 10:14, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
>>
>>> On 3 February 2014 08:42, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Ashley,
>>
On 3 February 2014 10:14, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
>
>> On 3 February 2014 08:42, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>>
Ashley,
Wrt marketing plans: yes, but half way between my head
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
> On 3 February 2014 08:42, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>>> Ashley,
>>>
>>> Wrt marketing plans: yes, but half way between my head, and my private
>>> notes. Unfortunately, my private notes a
On 3 February 2014 08:42, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Ashley,
>>
>> Wrt marketing plans: yes, but half way between my head, and my private
>> notes. Unfortunately, my private notes also contain things from
>> private conversations with people.
On 03 Feb 2014, at 9:55 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Garren Smith wrote:
>
>> This is great. Is it possible to create a nice url like wiki.couchdb.comfor
>> it?
>>
>>
> .org rather ;) +1
Correct, thanks :)
>
>
>
>>
>> On 02 Feb 2014, at 10:04 PM, Andy W
29 matches
Mail list logo
