Re: [DISCUSS] Improved CouchDB logo

2014-10-27 Thread Joan Touzet
Jens Alfke wrote: > Watch whom you're calling a jerk, please. Sorry, I was trying to be humorous, not malicious. I know text can be difficult with these things, so please take no offense. > Uh, you can't own a "concept". You can own a patent, copyright or trademark. Again, not speaking literall

Re: [DISCUSS] Improved CouchDB logo

2014-10-27 Thread Paul Davis
Not for not, but BigCouch's "logo" has been sans human figure for nearly four years. This is from Adam Kocloski's slide deck at Erlang Factory SF, March 2011: http://f.cl.ly/items/3U0A1s0r361Z1Y3v1p1b/big-couch-logo.png That's just the earliest I can find it in a slide deck. I did find a few wher

Re: [DISCUSS] Improved CouchDB logo

2014-10-27 Thread Jens Alfke
> On Oct 27, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Interesting, but those CouchBase jerks already did it: Watch whom you're calling a jerk, please. > We might own the concept of Couch and the original red couch logo, Uh, you can't own a "concept". You can own a patent, copyright or tradema

Re: [DISCUSS] Improved CouchDB logo

2014-10-27 Thread Bryan Green
Oh, yep. Sigh. On Oct 27, 2014 8:32 PM, "Joan Touzet" wrote: > Interesting, but those CouchBase jerks already did it: > > > http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/67/Couchbase%2C_Inc._official_logo.png > > We might own the concept of Couch and the original red couch logo, but > I am sure they

Re: [DISCUSS] Improved CouchDB logo

2014-10-27 Thread Joan Touzet
Interesting, but those CouchBase jerks already did it: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/67/Couchbase%2C_Inc._official_logo.png We might own the concept of Couch and the original red couch logo, but I am sure they'll get angry and make our lives difficult if we make ours look similar to

Re: [DISCUSS] Improved CouchDB logo

2014-10-27 Thread Brad Noble
Suggestive as it may be, the logo clearly embodies the idea of "relax." Specifics of the image aside, is "relax" what we want people to think of when they think of CouchDB? To me, the idea that CouchDB is about relaxation is outmoded. A good thought for the beginnings, but not for the long-haul. I

Re: [DISCUSS] Improved CouchDB logo

2014-10-27 Thread Bryan Green
I think it would be interesting just to get rid of the person altogether and have some sort of stylized couch. Bryan Green aka "lispyone" On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > At 3 different conferences I've attended in 2014: CloudantCON 2014, > OSCON 2014 and Velocity NYC 2014,

[DISCUSS] Improved CouchDB logo

2014-10-27 Thread Joan Touzet
At 3 different conferences I've attended in 2014: CloudantCON 2014, OSCON 2014 and Velocity NYC 2014, I've been approached by people complaining about the CouchDB logo. The argument is that the logo looks like a man who is posed in a suggestive way, or as one person put it, "showing you his crotch

Future of Externals

2014-10-27 Thread Jamie Bliss
After having a discussion in IRC about externals, it was suggested I post to the dev list. It was brought up that the externals APIs (os_daemons and httpd_global_handlers, as described in < http://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/externals.html>) might be removed in a future release (2.0?). Here is my u

Documentation framework: slate + quilter?

2014-10-27 Thread Joan Touzet
At a previous CouchDB IRC meeting I mentioned that Cloudant had worked up a new approach to documentation, capable of including per-language examples AND being hosted in CouchDB itself. I'd like to share the links, get feedback and see if the community is interested in helping develop it further.

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Fix for group_level not being explic...

2014-10-27 Thread benkeen
GitHub user benkeen opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/112 Fix for group_level not being explicitly passed. Closes COUCHDB-2412 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/benkeen/couchdb-fau

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2412) group_level exact should explicitly pass value

2014-10-27 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14185851#comment-14185851 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on COUCHDB-2412: - GitHub user benkeen opened a pull req

[jira] [Work started] (COUCHDB-2412) group_level exact should explicitly pass value

2014-10-27 Thread Ben Keen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on COUCHDB-2412 started by Ben Keen. - > group_level exact should explicitly pass value > --

[jira] [Assigned] (COUCHDB-2412) group_level exact should explicitly pass value

2014-10-27 Thread Ben Keen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ben Keen reassigned COUCHDB-2412: - Assignee: Ben Keen > group_level exact should explicitly pass value > -

[jira] [Created] (COUCHDB-2412) group_level exact should explicitly pass value

2014-10-27 Thread Ben Keen (JIRA)
Ben Keen created COUCHDB-2412: - Summary: group_level exact should explicitly pass value Key: COUCHDB-2412 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2412 Project: CouchDB Issue Type: Bug

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating _externals?

2014-10-27 Thread Paul Davis
They've always been a bit of an odd beast. In hindsight the best solution would've to remove the daemons/externals APIs altogether when the changes feed was introduced. I agree that they'll make little to no sense in a cluster, plus once you get around to managing a cluster adding the HAProxy/(runi

[DISCUSS] Deprecating _externals?

2014-10-27 Thread Joan Touzet
Today, someone came to the #couchdb channel asking about _externals. For a long while it's been on my mind that perhaps we should deprecate the entire _externals feature for a number of reasons: 1. Couch is not a great reverse proxy. Making it into one is as hard as rewriting nginx or hapro

Re: [PROPOSAL] Naming releases

2014-10-27 Thread Joan Touzet
-0.5 for all the reasons previously outlined. - Original Message - From: "Paul Davis" To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, andyw...@apache.org Cc: market...@couchdb.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 3:39:55 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Naming releases I'm a bit on the -1 side of things as w

Re: [PROPOSAL] Naming releases

2014-10-27 Thread Paul Davis
I'm a bit on the -1 side of things as well. Having two ways to refer to a release has always annoyed me with projects like Debian/Ubuntu. Granted they tend to use them a lot more interchangeably than Noah is suggesting, though I do wonder if it'd still lead to confusion. I think for the particular

Re: [PROPOSAL] Naming releases

2014-10-27 Thread Andy Wenk
I have a bit of a feeling, that the proposal is a bit misunderstood. Noah has written: "We'd mention the name in the release announcement and in the changelog. But otherwise, we'd continue to talk about releases using the release number." So we use the name for a CouchDB release solely for market

Re: [PROPOSAL] Naming releases

2014-10-27 Thread Klaus Trainer
I agree that it can be confusing. Ubuntu is doing that, and even though I've been using it for almost a decade now (and thus follow its release cycles pretty closely), I'm still getting confused about their release names from time to time. Please make sure that our project won't run the risk of c

Re: [PROPOSAL] Naming releases

2014-10-27 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
Also not a fan, its confusing and there’s an effort involved in coming up with a name, an artificial impediment to release cycles, and we have enough real ones. B. > On 27 Oct 2014, at 16:45, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > I’m not a fan, but I won’t be in the way of this. > > Best > Jan > -- > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Naming releases

2014-10-27 Thread Jan Lehnardt
I’m not a fan, but I won’t be in the way of this. Best Jan -- > On 27 Oct 2014, at 14:49 , Noah Slater wrote: > > Hi folks, > > SUMMARY > > I'm currently working on the rewards for the CouchDB AdvocateHub. (See > bottom of this email for a refresher.) > > One of the rewards I'd like to offe

[PROPOSAL] Naming releases

2014-10-27 Thread Noah Slater
Hi folks, SUMMARY I'm currently working on the rewards for the CouchDB AdvocateHub. (See bottom of this email for a refresher.) One of the rewards I'd like to offer is the ability to "name" a CouchDB release. We'd mention the name in the release announcement and in the changelog. But otherwise,

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread robertkowalski
Github user robertkowalski commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#issuecomment-60592465 Hi Garren, thanks for the feedback, I changed the code. > The icons when I click on any 'plus` menu dropdown are bigger. Should be fixed n

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#issuecomment-60566146 @robertkowalski, This PR needs a fair amount of work. Some bugs I noticed. * The icons when I click on any 'plus` menu dropdown are bigger. * I cannot

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393721 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393698 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393636 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393660 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393594 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393567 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393525 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393549 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393545 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393478 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393491 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393464 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393441 --- Diff: app/addons/indexes/views.js --- @@ -0,0 +1,641 @@ +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the 'License'); you may not

[GitHub] couchdb-fauxton pull request: Port View Indexes work from PR #33

2014-10-27 Thread garrensmith
Github user garrensmith commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/106#discussion_r19393371 --- Diff: app/addons/fauxton/tests/paginateSpec.js --- @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ define([ //do this so it doesn't throw an error on other unw