Github user wohali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/437
Whoops, my mistake. Carry on!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Hi Katharina,
No, that is not the case. readthedocs.org (which hosts docs.couchdb.org
for us) still auto-builds PDF and EPUB documentation. You'll still
have access to that for as long as readthedocs.org sticks around (and
as long as we continue to use them to host our online docs, which is
for
GitHub user devtanc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-nano/pull/38
Updated documentation for clarification
db.view params requirements
#37
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user devtanc opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-nano/issues/37
Improvement to documentation
I have noticed that the `params` object used in the `db.view` context can
be difficult to understand, since the example given doesn't include on at all.
I think
Github user wohali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/462
+1, thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user wohali closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/462
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Wow, that change happened more quickly than I expected. I assume this
means that there will be no PDF file available for download - just HTML
and EPUB?
If that's the case, there is one downside I'm seeing: The PDF is
currently the only way to properly quote the CouchDB docs in scientific
work.
Github user millayr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/issues/879
We filter out `_design/_replicator` here:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/blob/master/app/addons/replication/api.js#L308
We may just want to filter out anything that
GitHub user millayr opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/issues/879
Replication UI does not render when _replicator contains ddoc with filter
function
If a user has created a ddoc in the `_replicator` db that defines a filter
function for use with filtered
Oops, well spotted Jan
Upgrading to node 6 should fix this
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 at 4:07 PM Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Garren, the log shows
>
> npm ERR! node v4.2.6
> npm ERR! npm v2.14.12
>
> So yeah, npm 3 and node 6 would be preferable :)
>
> Joan, let me know if you need help
GitHub user mhall119 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/462
Tell Git to ignore snap files so they don't clutter things
Per Wohali's request on https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/460
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Garren, the log shows
npm ERR! node v4.2.6
npm ERR! npm v2.14.12
So yeah, npm 3 and node 6 would be preferable :)
Joan, let me know if you need help with any of this.
Best
Jan
--
> On 21 Mar 2017, at 13:06, Garren Smith wrote:
>
> Hi Joan,
>
> What version of node and
Github user benel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/324
@wohali Martin did this for me when he was one of my students. I'm not sure
he's still on GitHub.
Which tests do you need to be run? Travis tests?
If yes, here is a rebase on CouchDB
Hi Joan,
What version of node and npm is on the build server? I did some googling
around and the best I can find around that npm issue is that it might be an
older npm or there is some connection issues with npm.
We use node 6 with Travis and haven't seen this issue. Is it possible to
cache npm
Github user garrensmith closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/877
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user garrensmith closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/878
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
16 matches
Mail list logo