Re: CouchDB 1.7.1 vs single node 2.1.1

2017-11-24 Thread Jan Lehnardt
> On 24. Nov 2017, at 06:53, Johs Ensby wrote: > > Hi, > could someone give me the top three benefits of using single node 2.1.1 over > 1.7.1 and vice versa? 2.1.1 > 1.7.1: - multicore view/mango indexing, even on single nodes vie sharding - significantly faster compaction and less i/o-hungry

Re: Shard level querying in CouchDB Proposal

2017-11-24 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hi Mike, this is a great proposal, thanks a lot! I like this general idea, I guess this was what Adam was hinting at in the _access draft review ;) I left one comments inline. > On 22. Nov 2017, at 14:56, Mike Rhodes wrote: > > All, > > Just to be clear before starting: this is a proposal fr

Re: Some extra opinions for Mango Index Selection Fallback

2017-11-24 Thread Jan Lehnardt
I’m +1 as well. Not to derail this particular discussion (but watch me do it anyway ;): it be great if we could add a metric akin to “slow queries” that gets incremented every time we do the fallback. Ideally then this could be shown in Fauxton is growing steadily, and external monitoring can look

Re: Shard level querying in CouchDB Proposal

2017-11-24 Thread Mike Rhodes
Johs, Good question. I think really it comes down to allowing the developer more options in how they access data, and how the database can help this be more efficient. I don't think it reduces the usefulness of clustering. We still have three replicas of each shard, which allows different node