Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.2.0-RC3

2018-08-02 Thread Joan Touzet
Thanks for the fix - not going to cut -RC4 for this though - Original Message - From: "Alexis Côté" To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, "Joan Touzet" Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 9:40:21 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.2.0-RC3 Tested on Windows 10. Manually tested

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.2.0-RC3

2018-08-02 Thread Nick Vatamaniuc
+1 CentOS 7, Erlang 20 signature: ok checksum: ok make check: ok make release: ok couch starts: ok Fauxton verify install: ok Detailed steps, including Erlang package and other deps install and configuration: https://gist.github.com/nickva/3b591654a523613e191463c5030406db On Thu, Aug 2, 2018

Re: Shard level querying in CouchDB Proposal

2018-08-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
> On 2. Aug 2018, at 15:37, Garren Smith wrote: > > There was a discussion on #couchdb-dev and the proposal is that instead of > using _shards we would rather have _nodes so we could requests like /_node/ > couchdb@192.168.0.3/shards%2f-1%2ffoo/docid Clarification: I was proposing to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.2.0-RC3

2018-08-02 Thread Alexis Côté
Tested on Windows 10. Manually tested changes in Fauxton. Everything works as expected on Chrome, IE11 and Edge. Although, I found that the offline document link is broken on Fauxton... Fix landing in a few seconds... 2018-08-02 8:59 GMT-04:00 Joan Touzet : > My own vote... > > * Tested on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.2.0-RC3

2018-08-02 Thread Garren Smith
+1 make check works MacOSX 10.6.3 On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > My own vote... > > * Tested on Windows 10, all the latest patches, VS2013 > * Cannot validate my own gpg signature meaningfully, skipped > * make check passes > * built installer > * Installed installer on

Re: Shard level querying in CouchDB Proposal

2018-08-02 Thread Garren Smith
There was a discussion on #couchdb-dev and the proposal is that instead of using _shards we would rather have _nodes so we could requests like /_node/ couchdb@192.168.0.3/shards%2f-1%2ffoo/docid That then allows us to use _partition as an endpoint for the partition work without us

svn commit: r28512 - in /dev/couchdb/binary/win/2.2.0/rc.3: ./ couchdb-2.2.0-RC3.msi

2018-08-02 Thread wohali
Author: wohali Date: Thu Aug 2 12:59:57 2018 New Revision: 28512 Log: Adding CouchDB 2.2.0-RC3 Win x64 binary Added: dev/couchdb/binary/win/2.2.0/rc.3/ dev/couchdb/binary/win/2.2.0/rc.3/couchdb-2.2.0-RC3.msi (with props) Added: dev/couchdb/binary/win/2.2.0/rc.3/couchdb-2.2.0-RC3.msi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.2.0-RC3

2018-08-02 Thread Joan Touzet
My own vote... * Tested on Windows 10, all the latest patches, VS2013 * Cannot validate my own gpg signature meaningfully, skipped * make check passes * built installer * Installed installer on Windows 7 machine

[VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.2.0-RC3

2018-08-02 Thread Joan Touzet
Dear community, I would like to release Apache CouchDB 2.2.0-RC3. Changes since last round: * https://github.com/apache/couchdb/compare/2.2.0-RC2...2.2.0-RC3 * Fix for broken _stats collector on arrays in views Release notes: * http://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/2.2.html This is a

svn commit: r28509 - in /dev/couchdb/source/2.2.0/rc.3: ./ apache-couchdb-2.2.0-RC3.tar.gz apache-couchdb-2.2.0-RC3.tar.gz.asc apache-couchdb-2.2.0-RC3.tar.gz.sha256 apache-couchdb-2.2.0-RC3.tar.gz.sh

2018-08-02 Thread wohali
Author: wohali Date: Thu Aug 2 11:38:05 2018 New Revision: 28509 Log: Adding CouchDB 2.2.0-RC3 to dev tree Added: dev/couchdb/source/2.2.0/rc.3/ dev/couchdb/source/2.2.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-2.2.0-RC3.tar.gz (with props)

Re: Shard level querying in CouchDB Proposal

2018-08-02 Thread Joan Touzet
> I do agree with the confusion aspect of shards and partitions, and > I'm unsure exactly the way forward here yet :( This is all I care about, and I'm cross that this hasn't been given more serious consideration, given CouchDB is already confusing for people coming from other databases. Make all

Re: Shard level querying in CouchDB Proposal

2018-08-02 Thread Mike Rhodes
Joan, I'm in agreement that this feature isn't "more important" -- but neither is it "less important". They're both vital for different sets of users (app devs vs. admins I think). Disclosure: this URL scheme was mostly my thinking and is partly based around a future that is more partition