Issue filed, but please continue to +1 (or -1 if you must) to show broad
support for this initiative.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17376
- Original Message -
> From: "Eiri"
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, December 7, 2018 1:00:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [NOTICE]
+1
> On Dec 7, 2018, at 12:58, Joan Touzet wrote:
>
> Requesting lazy consensus - does anyone have a problem with them
> starting the process to mass-migrate all of the remaining repos to
> gitbox?
>
> This means integrated access and easy PRs on repos like couchdb-admin,
> couchdb-ets-lru,
+1
--
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!
GPG public key:
http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x45D3565377F93D29
> On 7. Dec 2018, at 18:45, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> +1
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:58 AM Joan Touzet wrote:
>>
>> Requesting lazy consensus - does anyone have a problem with
+1
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:58 AM Joan Touzet wrote:
>
> Requesting lazy consensus - does anyone have a problem with them
> starting the process to mass-migrate all of the remaining repos to
> gitbox?
>
> This means integrated access and easy PRs on repos like couchdb-admin,
> couchdb-ets-lru,
Requesting lazy consensus - does anyone have a problem with them
starting the process to mass-migrate all of the remaining repos to
gitbox?
This means integrated access and easy PRs on repos like couchdb-admin,
couchdb-ets-lru, etc.
I can't imagine anyone will say no, but we need "documented
[IF YOUR PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE GIT REPOSITORIES ON GIT-WIP-US PLEASE
DISREGARD THIS EMAIL; IT WAS MASS-MAILED TO ALL APACHE PROJECTS]
Hello Apache projects,
I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the
git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming
