Re: [VOTE]: Deprecate _update Endpoint

2020-05-06 Thread Jan Lehnardt
> On 6. May 2020, at 17:40, Adam Kocoloski wrote: > > When we looked at some of our internal usage data we found that _update had > measurably higher adoption than the rendering functions, so we didn’t push so > hard on deprecating it yet. > > I’d feel better about removing this endpoint if

Re: [VOTE]: Deprecate _update Endpoint

2020-05-06 Thread Adam Kocoloski
When we looked at some of our internal usage data we found that _update had measurably higher adoption than the rendering functions, so we didn’t push so hard on deprecating it yet. I’d feel better about removing this endpoint if there was a clear plan to provide alternative server-side partial

Re: [VOTE]: Deprecate _update Endpoint

2020-05-06 Thread Nick V
+1 > On May 6, 2020, at 08:04, Jonathan Hall wrote: > > +1 > >> On 5/6/20 1:57 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> it appears we missed an item in our 3.0 deprecations list and we should >> clear this up. >> >> We have as of yet failed to capture consensus here about the >> deprecatio

Re: [VOTE]: Deprecate _update Endpoint

2020-05-06 Thread Jonathan Hall
+1 On 5/6/20 1:57 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: Hey all, it appears we missed an item in our 3.0 deprecations list and we should clear this up. We have as of yet failed to capture consensus here about the deprecation of the _update endpoint. I think we *have* consensus here, but we didn’t make it st

Re: [VOTE]: Deprecate _update Endpoint

2020-05-06 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
+1. > On 6 May 2020, at 12:57, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Hey all, > > it appears we missed an item in our 3.0 deprecations list and we should > clear this up. > > We have as of yet failed to capture consensus here about the > deprecation of the _update endpoint. I think we *have* consensus here,

[VOTE]: Deprecate _update Endpoint

2020-05-06 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hey all, it appears we missed an item in our 3.0 deprecations list and we should clear this up. We have as of yet failed to capture consensus here about the deprecation of the _update endpoint. I think we *have* consensus here, but we didn’t make it stick in writing. To recap: the _update endpoi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 3.0.1 and 3.1.0 released

2020-05-06 Thread Jan Lehnardt
> On 6. May 2020, at 12:55, Sebastien wrote: > > Awesome news, thanks to everyone involved! > > A quick question about the JWT authentication support (greatest news in > this release for my project). Are there plans for Couch to support > extracting JWT tokens from a cookie? > In some scenari

Re: [Ticket ID: 345354] [couchdb-www] branch asf-site updated: feat: 3.1.0

2020-05-06 Thread Jan Lehnardt
FYI: I’ve removed this email address from the list. Best Jan — > On 6. May 2020, at 09:53, IdeaStack Support wrote: > > dev@couchdb.apache.org, > > Thank you for contacting our support team. A support ticket has now been > opened for your request. You will be notified when a response is made

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 3.0.1 and 3.1.0 released

2020-05-06 Thread Joan Touzet
Dear community, Apache CouchDB® 3.0.1 and 3.1.0 have been released and are available for download. Apache CouchDB® lets you access your data where you need it. The Couch Replication Protocol is implemented in a variety of projects and products that span every imaginable computing environment

[Ticket ID: 345354] [couchdb-www] branch asf-site updated: feat: 3.1.0

2020-05-06 Thread IdeaStack Support
dev@couchdb.apache.org, Thank you for contacting our support team. A support ticket has now been opened for your request. You will be notified when a response is made by email. The details of your ticket are shown below. Subject: [couchdb-www] branch asf-site updated: feat: 3.1.0 Priority: Medi