[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Howe updated COUCHDB-1791:
Description:
{code:javascript}
function(doc) {
if (doc.a === 'b') { emit(doc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Howe updated COUCHDB-1791:
Labels: performance (was: )
> Initial index of views is highly fragmen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13659437#comment-13659437
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1791:
-
Fixed, was just a typo here, not i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Howe updated COUCHDB-1791:
Affects Version/s: 1.2.1
> Initial index of views is highly fragmen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13654524#comment-13654524
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1791:
-
On [~rnewson]'s suggestio
James Howe created COUCHDB-1791:
---
Summary: Initial index of views is highly fragmented
Key: COUCHDB-1791
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1791
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13548682#comment-13548682
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-536:
Think I've hit the same thing in 1.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13402939#comment-13402939
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1506:
-
There's no guarantee over what v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13294275#comment-13294275
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1496:
-
When the document is deleted, all o
James Howe created COUCHDB-1481:
---
Summary: Futon fails to page design documents
Key: COUCHDB-1481
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1481
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13266468#comment-13266468
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1476:
-
What's wrong with Array.isArray and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13255061#comment-13255061
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1466:
-
A separate ticket should probably be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13254929#comment-13254929
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1466:
-
Can I clarify that this is not a reques
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13254695#comment-13254695
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1466:
-
If I want to control replication I shoul
Versions: 1.2
Reporter: James Howe
Futon's replicator page should have the option of making the task persistent
(i.e. it should add a document to _replictor rather than making the usual POST).
Probably implemented as another checkbox next to "Continuous".
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13229098#comment-13229098
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1439:
-
FWIW this sounds like good behaviour
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13219117#comment-13219117
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-476:
A good system is to use window.localStorag
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13214679#comment-13214679
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1415:
-
Does this only happen when step 5 is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13202197#comment-13202197
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1402:
-
ENOENT is basically file not found. L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13201180#comment-13201180
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1397:
-
@Marcello - for unit testing you can do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13199892#comment-13199892
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1397:
-
The string "function(doc) {}"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13199747#comment-13199747
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1397:
-
There's nothing "Inval
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13199616#comment-13199616
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1397:
-
For Paul's example alternatives, is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13198705#comment-13198705
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1179:
-
Deleted, cleaned-up, added and indexed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13189058#comment-13189058
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1381:
-
I think this is how you're supposed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13155769#comment-13155769
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-326:
Anti-Virus
> Occ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107698#comment-13107698
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1252:
-
Time's up :p
> A way to have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13102742#comment-13102742
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1175:
-
Just FYI, the JSONView Firefox exten
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13098788#comment-13098788
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1265:
-
Presumably this bug could cause dupli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13097067#comment-13097067
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1252:
-
ETA on this patch Jason?
> A way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13090866#comment-13090866
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1179:
-
doc_count: 5477
doc_del_count: 3
: James Howe
Priority: Minor
Off the back of COUCH-1252, I've just discovered there are such things as
design options and view options, including local_seq and include_design. Could
somebody who knows what they do document them somewhere?
--
This message is automatically generat
View Server
Affects Versions: 1.0.3, 1.1
Reporter: James Howe
Given that documents can be 'soft' deleted / deleted with auditing data by
updating the document to include the _deleted property, it would be incredibly
useful if there were a way to access these document
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Howe updated COUCHDB-1179:
Affects Version/s: 1.1
Happens with 1.1 too:
=erl_crash_dump:0.1
Wed Aug 03 10:20:10 2011
Environment: Windows XP
Reporter: James Howe
If design documents are deleted using an update to add _deleted while still
retaining the validate_doc_update function, it is still run on updates.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see
Versions: 1.0.2
Environment: Windows XP, 32-bit
Reporter: James Howe
While querying new views consecutively, some of which are very large, erl.exe
crashes. First few sections of the dump:
=erl_crash_dump:0.1
Thu May 26 11:34:32 2011
Slogan: eheap_alloc: Cannot allocate 32097420
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035502#comment-13035502
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1163:
-
Just FYI we've already rescued
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035473#comment-13035473
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1163:
-
If there's doubt about whether the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034718#comment-13034718
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1163:
-
I'm also trying to get a simple rep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034633#comment-13034633
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-885:
Sorry, there is a _conflicts, it's no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034097#comment-13034097
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-885:
And I think you're confusing deleted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034037#comment-13034037
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-885:
This issue is still present in 1.0.2,
: Database Core
Affects Versions: 1.0.2, 1.0.1
Reporter: James Howe
Priority: Critical
Somehow, our cluster has developed the following problem on a handful of
documents. Will post reproduction steps if we find them. All properties have
been redacted. All the documents this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031701#comment-13031701
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1149:
-
Maybe someone could more completely docu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031674#comment-13031674
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1149:
-
The question was asked under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031117#comment-13031117
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1045:
-
COUCHDB-1154 - Same symptoms o
Affects Versions: 1.0.2
Reporter: James Howe
We have a cluster of many couches replicating between each other, and are using
a view to find conflicts for resolution. However, running the view with
include_docs returns doc: null for some id/rev pairs. These revisions can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Howe reopened COUCHDB-1149:
-
> Documentation of list functions doesn't explain how to use the 0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029289#comment-13029289
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1149:
-
I don't know the answer, s
uchDB
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 0.9
Reporter: James Howe
Priority: Minor
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Formatting_with_Show_and_List#Listing_Views_with_CouchDB_0.9
describes a style of list functions, but not where
Also weird was I tried opening it in a different tab and everything was
fine. Perhaps Firebug being annoying?
On 14 April 2011 21:47, Dale Harvey wrote:
> actually it is in trunk and 1.0.2 + 1.1
>
> not 1.0.1 though
>
>
> On 14 April 2011 13:44, Dale Harvey wrote:
>
>> weird I thought I patched
51 matches
Mail list logo
