Doh! Forgot about cassim.
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> _metadata is our special database which is valid.
> https://github.com/apache/couchdb-cassim/blob/master/src/cassim_metadata_cache.erl#L63-L64
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>
>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:15
Seems reasonable to me. I wonder if we should add a stdout log line that
indicates where logs are going? Would be easy to add that as a module callback
so it would work for stderr, file, and syslog.
> On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:36 PM, Joan Touzet wrote:
>
> Presently, CouchDB 2.0 logs only to stder
> On Apr 15, 2016, at 3:13 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>
>> On 14 Apr 2016, at 23:11, Joan Touzet wrote:
>>
>> Based on this information, are we in violation of ASF requirements? Can
>> anyone clarify for me what we actually need to be doing here?
>
> There is no such policy. We are also not
The macro is totally fine. There are always plenty of those to account for
windows/*nix differences so it's not dirty by any means.
> On Jul 18, 2015, at 8:28 AM, Nick North wrote:
>
> I see a couple of obvious solutions to this problem:
>
>
> 1. Use the thread_local keyword rather than
+1
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Andy Wenk wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> On 14 April 2015 at 21:02, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>> We create new mailing list c...@couchdb.apache.org (or your favourite
>> bike shed) that gets all JIRA and GitHu
Why not Git?
> On Jul 31, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Just a heads up that I'll be moving our official docs to Subversion so
> that we can version them properly and vote on patches instead of wiki
> diffs.
>
> I'll convert them to HTML so we can serve them up direct
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:37 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Davis
> wrote:
>
>> I've recently been having discussions about how to handle the
>> repository configuration for various bits of CouchDB post-merge. The
>> work that Benoit has been doing on the
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:47 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Davis
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I would also point out that even though our main repo would need to
>> fetch other dependencies from the internet to build the final output,
>> we fully intend that ou
November 28th is Thanksgiving which is big family thing. As long as it's not
that weekend I'm in.
> On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Is there interest in having a hackathon again in late November or early
> December?
>
> Ideally we'd focus this on
I tried this a long time ago with the binary to JS code in C. It didn't make
for a huge improvement in total speed.
On Jan 27, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Jason Smith wrote:
> Hey, Jan. This is a totally random and hypothetical idea:
>
> Do you think there would be any speedup to use term_to_binary()
I'd rather leave them or remove the functionality. Hiding the config chain
seems wrong.
On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> +0 on removing them.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:12 , Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>>>
-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb.git
General docs are up at:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/
GitWeb is at:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf
And a commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/commit/f07c75fe
On Friday, September 23, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Paul J. Davis wrote:
> SVN
e:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 23 September 2011 21:18, Randall Leeds > > (mailto:randall.le...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Thank you!
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 13:52, Paul J. Davis
>
as the current read-only
> mirror.
>
> Adam
>
> On Friday, September 23, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Paul J. Davis wrote:
>
> > Dear committers,
> >
> > We now have a green light from infrastructure to switch to using Git as our
> > writable VCS. This is to
Dear committers,
We now have a green light from infrastructure to switch to using Git as our
writable VCS. This is to be considered a live experiment. If something breaks
its possible we'll have to revert back to SVN. But nothing will break and
everyone will forgive me for any bugs that may cr
On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:37 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:05, Paul Davis wrote:
>> Conform to what?
>>
>> Also, I don't mind but we do generally have a policy of separating
>> behavior changes from formatting changes so that its easier to sift
>> through commits and menta
+1 here. Motions pass on latest OS X.
On May 30, 2011, at 8:09 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> * Signature OK
> * MD5 OK
> * SHA1 OK
> * Make check OK
> * Futon OK
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0
Woot!
On May 21, 2011, at 5:47 AM, rand...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: randall
> Date: Sat May 21 09:47:32 2011
> New Revision: 1125654
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1125654&view=rev
> Log:
> moving myself from THANKS to AUTHORS
>
> Modified:
>couchdb/trunk/AUTHORS
>couchdb/
1.0.3 is on my list for today
On May 15, 2011, at 11:50 AM, till wrote:
> Just wanted to ask what the status of either release is?
>
> Are the two tests failing still failing, or can we move on to make dist? :-)
>
> Till
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> On Thu,
Cool. I'll ignore it for now then.
On Apr 9, 2011, at 7:13 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> My nightly builds got tripped up on the make distcheck breakage, but seem to
> work after that got fixed.
>
>
> On 9 Apr 2011, at 02:25, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> Apparently the initial ejson commit has been
Adam,
I'm with Bob on this one. 1.1 and 1.0 are forked so they stay the same. This
should only concern trunk.
Also, just rewriting couchjs and letting configure choose for 1.2 might be
doable.
On Apr 2, 2011, at 6:09 AM, Robert Newson wrote:
> +1 for supporting 1.8.5 exclusively from trunk
Here is some high level text on it.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-988
On Feb 15, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am very interested in understanding how conflict resolution works in
> couchdb:
>
> Is there a technical overview, somewhere, of how a node d
I've already got the bits made, if you can double check what's online, that'd
be great. Unfortunately I'm already back in Iowa so free time will be hit or
miss.
Paul Davis
On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> I have an hour or two to help you through this process Paul.
>
> Are y
On Apr 6, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2010, at 10:50 PM, Paul J Davis wrote:
>
>> This corruption was quite odd in that there wasn't a conspicuous reason for
>> it. I didn't dive to deep into the whole thing so it's possible i missed
This corruption was quite odd in that there wasn't a conspicuous reason for it.
I didn't dive to deep into the whole thing so it's possible i missed something
obvious.
There are two things at play here. How proactive should we be in provoking
these errors and how much should we check for sit
25 matches
Mail list logo
