Re: [DISCUSS] Rebase CouchDB on top of FoundationDB

2019-01-23 Thread William Edney
As someone who is a user of CouchDB and who's normally a lurker here (which maybe means my opinion doesn't mean much), I would humbly submit that a higher priority (for me at least) is the lack of per-user document access as detailed here: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1524 I'm not sur

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 2.1.0 released

2017-08-07 Thread William Edney
Congrats to all, but especially to Joan whose hard work and undying persistence made this release happen! As a "basic" user of CouchDB, this release fixed a number of bugs for me and is going to allow me to use the Couch 2.X series for my clients and company. If there's ever any doubt to anyone on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.1.0-RC1

2017-08-02 Thread William Edney
I'm not > > sure what the proper solution is for this sort of thing. If memory > > serves I think you can move things into the App Bundle and do magical > > things but I've not got any idea how that sort of thing works. > > > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:18 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.1.0-RC1

2017-08-02 Thread William Edney
Jan - I tried the Mac binary 'app bundle' 2.1 build on a machine with no prior CouchDB installation (no prior 'app bundle' builds or other CouchDBs installed via something like 'brew') and it doesn't work for me. The process seems hung. OS: macOS Sierra, v10.12.6 Hardware: MBP, 2.9Ghz i7 Here's

Re: NanoJS

2017-02-21 Thread William Edney
This is excellent news that Nuno is willing to help to get things moved over to the official repo - thanks Nuno (and thanks for Nano!!). It looks like there's currently 13 PRs against dscape/nano. I agree with Garren that moving those over to apache/couchdb-nano so that they're not lost is a prior

Re: [Release] CouchDB 2.0

2016-09-20 Thread William Edney
Congratulations to the Apache CouchDB development community for the 2.0 release! Thank you for your persistence and hard work. Looking forward to using this new release. Cheers, - Bill On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Александр Опак wrote: > 99% compatible, You guys the best! > > 2016-09-20 1

Re: CouchDB 2.0 blog series

2016-08-01 Thread William Edney
As a relative newbie to Couch (I've dabbled over the years, but been mostly a front-end guy), these blog posts have been excellent. This post, in particular, has the 'correct amount' of technical detail, IMHO, and should be used an example to inform other blog writers as to the level of detail in t

Re: [POC] Mango Catch All Selector

2016-02-12 Thread William Edney
t; > >>>>>>> I like this! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jan > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>&

Re: [POC] Mango Catch All Selector

2016-01-08 Thread William Edney
Hi Robert - As a builder of UI, API and library code who has also done developer training on a variety of technologies, one simple fix might be go ahead and not require indexes to be built, but then to put a big NOTE at the beginning of the "Mango Getting Started" guide (I would assume there is su

Re: CouchDB on DigitalOcean

2015-12-19 Thread William Edney
Clemens - You seem to be focusing, with your previous postings about an official Docker image and now about a Digital Ocean image, on making CouchDB as fast and easy to run up as possible. Other products have this and I see easy setup/one-click installs, etc. etc. as critical to getting people to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deprecate global functions in query server

2015-12-12 Thread William Edney
So I'm a lurker here and most of you don't know me, so feel free to ignore my opinion here :-). I've only been getting into CouchDB heavily lately, but have been doing JavaScript for quite a few years. My first thought is that whatever change is going to me made here that be done such that it lead