+1
> On 29 Apr 2015, at 17:48, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>> On 29 Apr 2015, at 17:07, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Seems nobody against that so I'm going to proceed on this.
>>>
>>> Side question: I just recall that ther
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>> On 29 Apr 2015, at 17:07, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Seems nobody against that so I'm going to proceed on this.
>>
>> Side question: I just recall that there was an idea to move javascript
>> test suite into own repository - Jan
> On 29 Apr 2015, at 17:07, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Seems nobody against that so I'm going to proceed on this.
>
> Side question: I just recall that there was an idea to move javascript
> test suite into own repository - Jan, is that yours? - in order to
> make it reusable for Pouc
Hi,
Seems nobody against that so I'm going to proceed on this.
Side question: I just recall that there was an idea to move javascript
test suite into own repository - Jan, is that yours? - in order to
make it reusable for PouchDB project and friends. I like this idea
even more, and following this
Sounds sensible to me :)
Good job there!
Best
Jan
--
> On 13 Jan 2015, at 19:24 , Alexander Shorin wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> I would like to a bit change our tests layout. Currently, we have
> roughly the following picture:
> - couchdb: javascript-based integration tests
> - couchdb-couch:
Hi everyone!
I would like to a bit change our tests layout. Currently, we have
roughly the following picture:
- couchdb: javascript-based integration tests
- couchdb-couch: eunit both functional and integration tests
- couchdb-couch-replicator: eunit both functional and integration tests
- couchdb