Thank you all!
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 10:41 AM Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> The vote passes. Thanks all for participating.
>
> Onwards!
>
> Best
> Jan, excited
> —
>
> > On 30. Jul 2019, at 10:27, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> >
> > Dear CouchDB developers,
> >
> > This vote decides whether the CouchDB project
The vote passes. Thanks all for participating.
Onwards!
Best
Jan, excited
—
> On 30. Jul 2019, at 10:27, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> Dear CouchDB developers,
>
> This vote decides whether the CouchDB project accepts the proposal[1]
> to switch our underlying storage and distributed systems techno
I am concerned about the impact to small installations, and especially
the release engineering / packaging work that will be required, but this
is clearly the best way to improve our storage and clustering layer
without bringing on >10 devs with years to burn and ample experience.
+1
On 2019-07-
+1
From: Jay Doane
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Cc: "priv...@couchdb.apache.org Private"
Date: 2019/07/31 12:31 AM
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Adopt FoundationDB
+1
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:27 AM Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Dear CouchDB develop
+1
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:27 AM Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Dear CouchDB developers,
>
> This vote decides whether the CouchDB project accepts the proposal[1]
> to switch our underlying storage and distributed systems technology out
> for FoundationDB[2].
>
> At the outset, we said that we wanted t
> On 30. Jul 2019, at 10:27, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> Dear CouchDB developers,
>
> This vote decides whether the CouchDB project accepts the proposal[1]
> to switch our underlying storage and distributed systems technology out
> for FoundationDB[2].
>
> At the outset, we said that we wanted t
+1
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:06 AM Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:25 AM Wendall Cada wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:08 AM Adam Kocoloski
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > > On Jul 30, 2019, at 4:27 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear
+1
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:25 AM Wendall Cada wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:08 AM Adam Kocoloski
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > > On Jul 30, 2019, at 4:27 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear CouchDB developers,
> > >
> > > This vote decides whether the CouchDB project accepts th
+1
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:08 AM Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Jul 30, 2019, at 4:27 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> >
> > Dear CouchDB developers,
> >
> > This vote decides whether the CouchDB project accepts the proposal[1]
> > to switch our underlying storage and distributed systems techno
+1
> On Jul 30, 2019, at 4:27 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> Dear CouchDB developers,
>
> This vote decides whether the CouchDB project accepts the proposal[1]
> to switch our underlying storage and distributed systems technology out
> for FoundationDB[2].
>
> At the outset, we said that we wante
+1
B.
> On 30 Jul 2019, at 09:51, Garren Smith wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 AM Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> Dear CouchDB developers,
>>
>> This vote decides whether the CouchDB project accepts the proposal[1]
>> to switch our underlying storage and distributed systems tech
+1
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:27 AM Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Dear CouchDB developers,
>
> This vote decides whether the CouchDB project accepts the proposal[1]
> to switch our underlying storage and distributed systems technology out
> for FoundationDB[2].
>
> At the outset, we said that we wanted
Dear CouchDB developers,
This vote decides whether the CouchDB project accepts the proposal[1]
to switch our underlying storage and distributed systems technology out
for FoundationDB[2].
At the outset, we said that we wanted to cover these topic areas before
making a vote:
- Bylaw changes
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
