On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 03:26:00PM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> Now, I'm afraid I don't really grok this autoconf/automake spew, but I can
> see that it's correct.
By which I meant: "the error returned by make is correct", i.e.
etc/default/couchdb is missing.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:47:40PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> I cannot reproduce this error.
Hmm. Replicates for me. Ubuntu Hardy i386. ./configure is OK, but 'make'
gives the following very quickly (doesn't even need 'make distcheck')
...
make[3]: Leaving directory `/data/v/build/apache-couchdb
+1
Mac OS X 10.6.3 (10D572)
Erlang R13B04
make check: ok
All tests successful.
Files=33, Tests=456, 46 wallclock secs (15.53 cusr + 3.25 csys = 18.78 CPU)
Test suite on Safari 4.0.5: ok
22 mar 2010 kl. 16.54 skrev Noah Slater:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.1
On 22 Mar 2010, at 17:52, Sam Bisbee wrote:
>
> I'm seeing the same failure on Debian squeeze. `make distcheck` gives me this:
>
> { test ! -d "apache-couchdb-0.11.0" || { find "apache-couchdb-0.11.0" -type d
> ! -perm -200 -exec chmod u+w {} ';' && rm -fr "apache-couchdb-0.11.0"; }; }
> test -
I have aborted the vote to address the build problems under Linux.
On 22 Mar 2010, at 15:54, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, first round.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts
> so that
On 23 Mar 2010, at 04:51, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Hi Noah.
>
> building on Linux is still busted.
>
>> for tool in 'make' 'libtool' 'automake' 'autoconf'; do $tool --version |
>> head -n1; done
> GNU Make 3.81
> ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 2.2.4
> automake (GNU automake) 1.10.1
> autoconf (GNU Auto
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, first round.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts
> so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:33 PM, till wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>> On 22 Mar 2010, at 18:20, till wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, just figured! It helps to read _all_ the damn instructions. ;-)
>>>
>>> All tests successful.
>>> Files=33, Tests=456, 44 wallclock secs (20.15
Hi Noah.
building on Linux is still busted.
> for tool in 'make' 'libtool' 'automake' 'autoconf'; do $tool --version |
> head -n1; done
GNU Make 3.81
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 2.2.4
automake (GNU automake) 1.10.1
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.61
Is the any more info I can find you?
Cheers
Jan
--
O
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 22 Mar 2010, at 18:20, till wrote:
>
>> Ah, just figured! It helps to read _all_ the damn instructions. ;-)
>>
>> All tests successful.
>> Files=33, Tests=456, 44 wallclock secs (20.15 cusr + 3.29 csys = 23.44 CPU)
>
> What was the proble
On 22 Mar 2010, at 18:20, till wrote:
> Ah, just figured! It helps to read _all_ the damn instructions. ;-)
>
> All tests successful.
> Files=33, Tests=456, 44 wallclock secs (20.15 cusr + 3.29 csys = 23.44 CPU)
What was the problem?
> Btw, can I contribute a patch to INSTALL.Unix ?
>
> http
Ah, just figured! It helps to read _all_ the damn instructions. ;-)
All tests successful.
Files=33, Tests=456, 44 wallclock secs (20.15 cusr + 3.29 csys = 23.44 CPU)
Btw, can I contribute a patch to INSTALL.Unix ?
http://friendpaste.com/uwiNQyn5sIZkTcytegy3i
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:14 PM,
"What version of make are you using? We require GNU Make, so try again with
"gmake" instead."
>
On 22 Mar 2010, at 18:13, till wrote:
> My gmake is fine, how is your's? =)
>
> But what are you referring to?
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> What about gmake?
>>
>> O
My gmake is fine, how is your's? =)
But what are you referring to?
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> What about gmake?
>
> On 22 Mar 2010, at 18:02, till wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>> What PREFIX did you use? We don't support spaces.
>>
What about gmake?
On 22 Mar 2010, at 18:02, till wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> What PREFIX did you use? We don't support spaces.
>
> No PREFIX sir. ;-)
>
> ./bootstrap
> ./configure
> make check
>
> Till
>
>>
>> What version of make are you using? We requir
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> What PREFIX did you use? We don't support spaces.
No PREFIX sir. ;-)
./bootstrap
./configure
make check
Till
>
> What version of make are you using? We require GNU Make, so try again with
> "gmake" instead.
>
> On 22 Mar 2010, at 17:30, ti
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 18:51, Noah Slater wrote:
> If you can compile manually, but your ebuild fails, I would suggest you check
> your ebuild for problems.
Well, Jan said he saw the same error, so it's not just my ebuild. And
I just tried to manually execute the configure command from the
afor
What PREFIX did you use? We don't support spaces.
What version of make are you using? We require GNU Make, so try again with
"gmake" instead.
On 22 Mar 2010, at 17:30, till wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like call a vote for the Apache Cou
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:23:55PM -0500, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 22 Mar 2010, at 12:18, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> >
> > On 22 Mar 2010, at 12:07, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 16:54, Noah Slater wrote:
> >>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
> >>>
>
If you can compile manually, but your ebuild fails, I would suggest you check
your ebuild for problems.
On 22 Mar 2010, at 17:23, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 22 Mar 2010, at 12:18, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>>
>> On 22 Mar 2010, at 12:07, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 16:5
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, first round.
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts
> so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made.
On 22 Mar 2010, at 12:18, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 22 Mar 2010, at 12:07, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 16:54, Noah Slater wrote:
>>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/0.11.0/
>>
>> I copied my ebuil
On 22 Mar 2010, at 12:07, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 16:54, Noah Slater wrote:
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>>http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/0.11.0/
>
> I copied my ebuild (I package CouchDB for Gentoo) from 0.10.1, changed
> the
+1
OS X 10.6.2
Erlang: R13B03
all test pass in make check
All Futon tests pass in FF and Safari and ./test/javascript/run
changes.js fails in Chrome with known browser detection issue
On Mar 22, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache Couc
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 16:54, Noah Slater wrote:
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/0.11.0/
I copied my ebuild (I package CouchDB for Gentoo) from 0.10.1, changed
the download URI to point to the 0.11 tarball, then ran into an er
+1
Mac OS X, Version 10.6.2
Test suite in Futon:
60 of 60 test(s) run, 0 failures (57059 ms)
make check:
All tests successful.
Files=33, Tests=456, 69 wallclock secs (15.52 cusr + 3.78 csys = 19.30 CPU)
Cheers,
Chris
--
Christopher Brown
VP, Engineering
Opscode
http://www.opscode.com
Hey devs,
OS: Mac OS X 10.6.2
Erlang: R13B03
Spidermonkey: spidermonkey 1.9.2 (according to homebrew at least)
make check: ok
browser test suite (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6): ok
some custom tests with own projects: ok
my vote: +1
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.0 release, first round.
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts
so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made.
Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
W
28 matches
Mail list logo
