t;> proactive against any perceived problem.
>>>
>>> I will not be crestfallen if this vote fails, but I will continue
>>> to advocate for its adoption.
>>>
>>> PMC members, please make your voices heard, one way or the other.
>>>
>&g
>> I will not be crestfallen if this vote fails, but I will continue
>> to advocate for its adoption.
>>
>> PMC members, please make your voices heard, one way or the other.
>>
>> -Joan
>>
>> ----- Original Message -
>>> From: "
t I will continue
> to advocate for its adoption.
>
> PMC members, please make your voices heard, one way or the other.
>
> -Joan
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Robert Newson"
> > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, 5 Mar
heard, one way or the other.
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Newson"
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 March, 2019 3:37:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws change: Establish a Qualified Lazy Majority vote
> type for the RFC p
-1 for the following reason:
"https://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#hats
INDIVIDUALS COMPOSE THE ASF
All of the ASF including the board, the other officers, the committers, and the
members, are participating as individuals. That is one strength of the ASF,
affiliations do not cloud
(Revised: The Reply-To field on the last email was incorrect. I am
also including the diff of the proposed changes to this email per
request.)
PMC Members,
This is a VOTE to create or amend our official documents.
It establishes a new Qualified Lazy Majority voting type, and
PMC Members,
This is a VOTE to create or amend our official documents.
It establishes a new Qualified Lazy Majority voting type, and amends
the bylaws to use this new type for RFC votes only.
This vote depends on the RFC vote passing.
The git branch with the proposed further changes to the
