--
> From: "Joan Touzet" >
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 6:58:39 PM
> Subject: Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update (all tests passing)
>
> Trimming the long thread for readability...
>
> Good news, everyone! As of the latest check
. Until then,
if you want the latest installer, you can build it yourself :)
All the best,
Joan
- Original Message -
From: "Joan Touzet"
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 6:58:39 PM
Subject: Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update (all tests passing)
Trimming t
Trimming the long thread for readability...
Good news, everyone! As of the latest checkin to master, CouchDB 2.0
builds correctly on Windows 64-bit! All eunit and javascript tests
pass (or are skipped intentionally).
This is a huge milestone! I especially want to thank Nick North and
Dave Cottle
hub.com/apache/couchdb-couch/pull/184 hopefully will land
>> soon
>> >> allowing the main couch eunit tests to pass.
>> >>
>> >> More worryingly we have a failure in jiffy on Windows:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://gist.g
/github.com/apache/couchdb-couch/pull/184 hopefully will land
> soon
> >> allowing the main couch eunit tests to pass.
> >>
> >> More worryingly we have a failure in jiffy on Windows:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/c79
allowing the main couch eunit tests to pass.
>>
>> More worryingly we have a failure in jiffy on Windows:
>>
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/c796d4b048efa90b17b1f43008c59783#file-gistfile1-txt-L381-L389
>>
>> Anyone who can help look at this one? (Pau
;
> -Joan
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Joan Touzet"
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 6:02:12 PM
> Subject: Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update
>
> Thanks, Paul. I'm starting to look at this today.
>
> In
ok at this one? (Paul?)
-Joan
- Original Message -
From: "Joan Touzet"
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 6:02:12 PM
Subject: Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update
Thanks, Paul. I'm starting to look at this today.
In better news, current Windows JS tes
on is looking at this failure right now and says we may be able
to improve upon the testing methodology.
-Joan
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Davis"
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 4:37:15 PM
Subject: Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update
The logs posted at
The logs posted at [1] show that we're seeing OS processes die with an
exit code of 4. The most likely place I can find that that comes from
is couchspawnkillable_win.c [2] which is nicely Windows specific so
would do a lot to explain why we don't see it on *nix systems.
Unfortunately other than po
Hi all,
just to follow up on that: there is another PR coming up (
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/427) that tests for some more fixes
and brings even more stability. In the meantime, deleting dev/lib is indeed
the best way to produce reliable results. So is switching between
auth-tests-wip
Thanks Sebastian. I'm looking at eunit at the moment, but hope to come back
to these.
Nick
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 at 23:01 Sebastian Rothbucher <
sebastianrothbuc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Joan, Nick,
>
> the following gist provides a current run of the test against the latest
> master of Couc
Hi Joan, Nick,
the following gist provides a current run of the test against the latest
master of CouchDB - and the latest tests (from the auth-tests-wip branch):
https://gist.github.com/sebastianrothbucher/efa3a992bd4de9996b4125da82a7e0de
Maybe you can use them
Here's what I did to get both late
Sorry - I meant a single node cluster in that last message. And I meant to
sign my name correctly.
Nick
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 at 16:56 Nick North wrote:
> I'm trying these tests now, and find that there are still a lot of JS
> failures with a single cluster. Many of them look suspiciously similar
I'm trying these tests now, and find that there are still a lot of JS
failures with a single cluster. Many of them look suspiciously similar at
an initial glance, but I hope to look in more detail tomorrow.
Nicj
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 at 15:20 Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> > On 17 Jun 2016, at 22:48, Jo
> On 17 Jun 2016, at 22:48, Joan Touzet wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'd like to update the community on the status of the 2.0 port to Microsoft
> Windows. There are three parts to this email: the build tools/chain
> themselves, support in CouchDB for the Windows build process, and testing
*facepalm* :) Nothing private, just...didn't want to clutter the list.
Sorry!
- Original Message -
> From: "Joan Touzet"
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 3:56:50 AM
> Subject: Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update
>
> Replying off list.
[SNIP]
ot;Nick North"
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, "Joan Touzet"
> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 3:37:50 AM
> Subject: Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update
>
> Hi Joan. This sounds like an improvement on my last Windows build
> attempt,
> which still had a couple of
Hi Joan. This sounds like an improvement on my last Windows build attempt,
which still had a couple of eunit failures outside the os_process area.
I'll attempt to reproduce your results today, and report back.
Nick
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 at 00:34 Joan Touzet wrote:
> Replying to my own email: dev/
Replying to my own email: dev/run is using the wrong path slashes for
the path to the javascript/coffeescript view servers. I've submitted a PR
and will merge if no one complains.
Here is the latest set of test results if anyone still wants to volunteer
to help me review them (both Eunit and JS, s
A small update on the testing front. I've tried replicating the animaldb from
Cloudant to my local server, and things looked very ugly:
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/f2a94234195f007c3049e27d942482c1
I've yet to dig into this failure; I'm posting it here in case anyone has the
time to analyze
Regarding the quote below, I just wanted to mention that this is indeed
how we use CouchDb here : as a production database on Windows Server.
We both develop on Windows and host on Windows. The first-class support
and stability of CouchDb on the platform largely contributed to our
interest in
Hello everyone,
I'd like to update the community on the status of the 2.0 port to Microsoft
Windows. There are three parts to this email: the build tools/chain themselves,
support in CouchDB for the Windows build process, and testing results. I'll
cover them in that order.
-Joan
Build Tools/C
23 matches
Mail list logo
