Restarting this thread.
Can I get an update on where things are at?
On 31/03/2020 13:13, Paul Davis wrote:
There are a few other bits to `make check` that aren't included in
`make check-fdb`. Updating `make check` should just be a matter of
taking our test subset and applying them to `make chec
There are a few other bits to `make check` that aren't included in
`make check-fdb`. Updating `make check` should just be a matter of
taking our test subset and applying them to `make check`.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:04 AM Garren Smith wrote:
>
> On the fdb branch we have a make check-fdb which
On the fdb branch we have a make check-fdb which is a subset of all the
tests that should pass. I think we should use that instead of make check
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:34 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
> Took a bit longer than expected, but it's been tested & validated, and
> then re-pushed. I'll push
Took a bit longer than expected, but it's been tested & validated, and
then re-pushed. I'll push up the other platforms as well (except for
CentOS 8, which still has a broken Python dependency).
PR for the changes necessary was also merged to couchdb-ci.
FDB should feel free to merge to master
OOPS, looks like I pushed the wrong image.
I'll build the kerl-based version of the image and re-push. This will
take a couple of hours, since I have to build 3x Erlangs from source.
Good to know step 1 works! Next step for y'all: fix `make check`.
-Joan
On 2020-03-30 6:05 p.m., Robert Samue
noting that
https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2732/7/pipeline/
now fails because kerl isn't there. related?
B.
> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:11, Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
>
> Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd tim
Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the 1st time
was a spurious failure, timing related).
B.
> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the check
> passing, I'm trying this n
Hi,
Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the check
passing, I'm trying this now.
First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system wide
erlang 20 install instead.
B.
> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet wrote:
>
> Hi everyone, hope you're all
Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].
I've just pushed out a new version of our
couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes the
fdb binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is a
necessary (but not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype m