Re: Prototype CouchDB Layer for FoundationDB

2019-03-28 Thread Paul Davis
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:58 AM Adam Kocoloski wrote: > > Hi Paul, good stuff. > > I agree with you about the FDB Subspaces feature. I’ve been thinking that our > layer code should maintain its own enumeration of the various “subspaces” to > single-byte prefixes within the directory. I haven’t

Re: Prototype CouchDB Layer for FoundationDB

2019-03-28 Thread Adam Kocoloski
Hi Paul, good stuff. I agree with you about the FDB Subspaces feature. I’ve been thinking that our layer code should maintain its own enumeration of the various “subspaces” to single-byte prefixes within the directory. I haven’t yet captured that in the RFCs, but e.g. we should be using ?REVISI

Re: Prototype CouchDB Layer for FoundationDB

2019-03-27 Thread Nick Vatamaniuc
Looking over the code, it seems very simple and clean. Without knowing much of the internals or following the discussion too closely I think I was able to read and understand most of it. I like split between db and fdb layers. Hopefully it means if we start from this we can do some parallel work i

Prototype CouchDB Layer for FoundationDB

2019-03-27 Thread Paul Davis
Hey everyone! I've gotten enough of a FoundationDB layer prototype implemented [1] to start sharing publicly. This is emphatically no where near useful to non-CouchDB-developers. The motivation for this work was to try and get enough of a basic prototype written so that we can all start fleshing o