The documentation in the source is a great idea, and it's great having it in
Futon. In my opinion the wiki is superfluous and should be removed.
My 2 cents.
-Filippo
On 19 May 2013 08:57, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > 1) Yes! Let's get the docs/ sorted out! Moving NEWS/CHANGES into them.
> > Moving CouchDB: The Definitive Guide into them. Incorporating the docs
> into
> > our merge and release procedure. D
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> I'm -0.9 (see http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html) on
> switching to Confluence. The choice of wiki technology is a tiny
> factor, in my opinion. No wiki is useful without active maintenance.
> Unless there's a horde of editors just
Quick response:
1) Yes! Let's get the docs/ sorted out! Moving NEWS/CHANGES into them.
Moving CouchDB: The Definitive Guide into them. Incorporating the docs into
our merge and release procedure. Drumming up a docs team! (Dave! Dirkjan!
Alexander! All the exclamation points!)
2) We will always ne
>
> I'd prefer to have quality docs in the source code / .rst files if
> possible. Wikis are ok for evolving stuff but if it's actually usage of
> CouchDB proper, in the source is the way to go. You get history directly
> tied to source code / release versions for free too.
>
I love having the man
I'm definitely in favour of building up the docs/ effort to replace
the wiki as *the* place to find out how couchdb works. I can't quite
picture what will be left of the wiki when that's achieved. I guess
the pages where we list contributors and couchdb-based projects, but
not too much else.
I'm -
> Anyway, I'm really excited about CouchDB and I really want to contribute to
> the global documentation out there, but MoinMoin ain't making it easy. I
> really think that a move to a better documentation tool could be a huge
> push to CouchDB's adoption. Thanks for listening.
Have you seen the n
On 1 May 2013 20:50, Paul Okstad wrote:
> Hello dev team,
>
> I'm following up on a brief discussion I had with the CouchDB twitter
> account (my handle: @pokstad) regarding the official ASF wiki for CouchDB.
>
> I'm a CouchDB evangelist in both my personal projects and at my full time
> job at a
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:58:44PM -0700, Jens Alfke wrote:
> I agree; it's pretty unpleasant to use. I've been contributing to it
> intermittently for over a year but it's always a chore.
+1
[snip]
> We use Confluence internally at Couchbase, but in practice people don't seem
> very happy wit
On May 1, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Paul Okstad
mailto:poks...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I believe part of the reason for the lack of documentation is the lack
luster moinmoin wiki.
I agree; it's pretty unpleasant to use. I've been contributing to it
intermittently for over a year but it's always a chore.
Hello dev team,
I'm following up on a brief discussion I had with the CouchDB twitter
account (my handle: @pokstad) regarding the official ASF wiki for CouchDB.
I'm a CouchDB evangelist in both my personal projects and at my full time
job at a large engineering company (not Atlassian, lol). When
11 matches
Mail list logo
