[jira] [Commented] (RAT-228) Test failures in antunit does not break the maven build / ANT does not seem to recognize additional licenses

2018-07-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16560791#comment-16560791 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on RAT-228: OK, running Ant via Maven overrides JAVA_HOME

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-228) Test failures in antunit does not break the maven build / ANT does not seem to recognize additional licenses

2018-07-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16560789#comment-16560789 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on RAT-228: spoke too soon, there are tons of errors but

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-228) Test failures in antunit does not break the maven build / ANT does not seem to recognize additional licenses

2018-07-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16560788#comment-16560788 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on RAT-228: Sorry, have been (actually still am) on vaca

[jira] [Comment Edited] (RAT-228) Test failures in antunit does not break the maven build / ANT does not seem to recognize additional licenses

2017-04-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988181#comment-15988181 ] Stefan Bodewig edited comment on RAT-228 at 4/28/17 4:2

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-228) Test failures in antunit does not break the maven build / ANT does not seem to recognize additional licenses

2017-04-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988181#comment-15988181 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on RAT-228: Well, I'm not really an export for runnin

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-233) Detect .NEt Core .xproj files

2017-04-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988167#comment-15988167 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on RAT-233: Thank you. > Detect .NEt Core .xpro

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-228) Test failures in antunit does not break the maven build / ANT does not seem to recognize additional licenses

2017-04-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15984623#comment-15984623 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on RAT-228: the {{failonerror="false"

[jira] [Commented] (RAT-228) Test failures in antunit does not break the maven build / ANT does not seem to recognize additional licenses

2017-04-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15984619#comment-15984619 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on RAT-228: While I was passing by I saw this report - a

[jira] [Comment Edited] (RAT-228) Test failures in antunit does not break the maven build / ANT does not seem to recognize additional licenses

2017-04-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15984619#comment-15984619 ] Stefan Bodewig edited comment on RAT-228 at 4/26/17 11:3

[jira] [Created] (RAT-233) Detect .NEt Core .xproj files

2017-04-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
Stefan Bodewig created RAT-233: -- Summary: Detect .NEt Core .xproj files Key: RAT-233 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-233 Project: Apache Rat Issue Type: Improvement

Your Gump Build(s)

2013-06-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Dear Community Apache Gump builds some of your projects and it is quite possible you don't know or have by now forgotten about it. More than half a year ago a technical problem has forced us to turn off emails on build failures as we would have been sending out lots of false alarms. Before we re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9

2013-04-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-04-08, sebb wrote: > On 3 April 2013 05:17, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> OK, in this case I vote with a +1 conditional on that the tarballs are >> published via www.apache.org/dist - and I'd really like it if they were >> removed from the staging repository

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9

2013-04-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-04-03, sebb wrote: > On 2 April 2013 05:31, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2013-03-31, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >>> The candidate staged at >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-039/ >>> (orgapachecreadur-039)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9

2013-04-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-03-31, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > The candidate staged at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-039/ > (orgapachecreadur-039) is ready for review. Please download, check and > then cast your vote (see [1]). Do you intend to move the distribution tarball

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project rat (in module rat) failed

2013-01-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-01-24, P. Ottlinger wrote: > I assume the problem is GUMP-local since I'm able to properly build and > download all necessary project parts. Yes, there seems to be an issue suddenly with the Maven Repository Proxy Gump employs. The code hasn't changed in months, maybe something on the Ma

Re: Unit test failure in trunk

2012-08-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-08-30, Olivier Lamy wrote: > any idea ? > My env: > Java version: 1.6.0_33, vendor: Apple Inc. > Java home: /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home > Default locale: fr_FR, platform encoding: MacRoman > OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.8", arch: "x86_64", family:

Re: svnpubsub for dist?

2012-08-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-08-30, sebb wrote: > Should I ask INFRA to set up the SVN release and dev dist folders? +1 > If so, where do we want the commit messages to go? I'd say commits@creadur Stefan

Re: Creadur project RAT failures

2012-08-17 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-08-16, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On 08/15/12 04:36, Gavin McDonald wrote: >> FilterTest.cs has no license - can we add one safely here ? > My reading of [1] is that the test involves appending a license after > the binary bit at the start of the file Or rather that the BOM is swall

Re: Graduation Handover Status

2012-06-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-06-10, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On 06/09/12 19:07, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > I think leaves only Nabble. I'm happy to mark this as done, and then > discuss adding Nabble later... +1 for ignoring Nabble. Stefan

Re: Board Report For June

2012-06-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-06-09, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > http://creadur.apache.org/boardreport.html > Please dive in :-) The syntax highlighting inside the draft looks more than wierd. I've just added a notice about the last release. Stefan

Re: Board Report For June

2012-06-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-06-09, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On 06/09/12 12:59, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2012-06-09, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >>> Some project (for example comdev[1]) use their site to develop the >>> content for each report. I like this idea: it's an

Re: Board Report For June

2012-06-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-06-09, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > Some project (for example comdev[1]) use their site to develop the > content for each report. I like this idea: it's an easy way for > everyone to get involved and works as news for the project. > Opinions? I'm all for drafting it in the open unless

Re: Subversion URL for rat

2012-05-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-05-13, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > rat is now at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/main/ > I wonder whether a svn move to > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat would make this clearer. > Opinions? +1 go fo it Stefan

Re: Switching Source

2012-05-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-05-07, Hugo Hirsch wrote: > There seems to be a resistance against JUnit 4.0 - what's the cause of > that? There was some resistance by me to require Java5 just to be able to use JUnit4. Now that we are at Java5 anyway I don't see any reason to stick to JUnit3 either. Stefan