Hello, Thanks for your help. It works but it does not give me the code value associated with a cui for SNOMED vocabulary. How can I get the code value for SNOMED or any other vocabulary.
"codingScheme" : "CTakes", "cui" : "C0085580", "tui" : "T047", "code" : "" Thank you, Harpreet On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Harpreet Khanduja <hsk5...@g.rit.edu> wrote: > I will try to do the same. > > Thank you, > > Harpreet > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Masanz, James J. <masanz.ja...@mayo.edu> > wrote: > >> >> I'm not an svn guru, but you can use Team->Update to get the latest of >> all the things you have not customized, plus SVN will tell you of the >> conflicts, and you can merge your customizations into the latest. I've done >> it when I haven't had many customizations to preserve. >> >> To get the new dictionary lookup (sub)project, you might have to do >> something to get it imported, such as going into the SVN repository >> exploring view and use Check out as Maven Project menu option on that >> (sub)project. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5...@rit.edu] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:32 PM >> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014 >> >> Hello, >> >> I checked out 3.1.1 from trunk SVN. >> >> Thank you >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Masanz, James J. <masanz.ja...@mayo.edu> >> wrote: >> >> > Did you download the source and import into eclipse, or did you check >> out >> > 3.1.1 from SVN. >> > If you checked it out from SVN, did you check it out from trunk, or from >> > the tag for 3.1.1. >> > >> > -- James >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5...@rit.edu] >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:49 PM >> > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014 >> > >> > Hello, >> > I am using ctakes 3.1.1 in eclipse and I have added my >> customizations to >> > the project, but now I want to update it to 3.2 so that I can use >> > ctakes-dictionary-lookup-fast. >> > Is there any way to update the whole ctakes project to 3.2 without my >> > customizations getting removed? >> > >> > It would be a great help. >> > >> > Thank you, >> > >> > Harpreet >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Harpreet Khanduja <hsk5...@g.rit.edu> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Thank you so much for your help. >> > > >> > > Harpreet. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Finan, Sean < >> > > sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi Harpreet, >> > >> >> > >> If you are willing to use cTakes 3.2, try the dictionary-lookup-fast >> > >> module as a replacement of the default dictionary-lookup. That >> module >> > has >> > >> a new dictionary resource (hsql, not lucene) and slightly different >> > methods >> > >> for lookup and matching. In time trials it has been faster than the >> > >> default module (hence the name). Accuracy depends upon the parameter >> > >> settings, but in the tests performed so far the results are >> comparable >> > or >> > >> better. The new dictionary is much leaner than the current default >> > >> dictionary, small enough to port from the hsql cached version to a >> hsql >> > >> in-memory version. Using the in-memory version makes dictionary >> lookup >> > >> practically instantaneous (hundredths of a second). Limited >> > documentation >> > >> is available in the module's doc/ directory. >> > >> >> > >> I will be on vacation for a week, but please don't hesitate to write >> if >> > >> you have any questions. >> > >> >> > >> Sean >> > >> ________________________________________ >> > >> From: Harpreet Khanduja [hsk5...@rit.edu] >> > >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:07 PM >> > >> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org >> > >> Subject: Lucene for UMLS2014 >> > >> >> > >> Hello, >> > >> I would be grateful if someone could help. >> > >> >> > >> I created a lucene index for umls2014 but only for snomed >> > vocabulary. >> > >> I did this because I thought this would reduce the dictionary >> look >> > up >> > >> time. >> > >> But it still almost the same. Is there any other way to improve >> the >> > >> dictionary look up time? >> > >> >> > >> Thank you, >> > >> Harpreet >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >
