RE: Medical record summarization [EXTERNAL]

2017-08-08 Thread Abilash.Mathew
Thanks Perter for the details. We are now exploring the solution at our end. It would be great , if you can share some insight into the approach that you have followed. Thanks, Abilash Mathew -Original Message- From: Abramowitsch, Peter [mailto:pabramowit...@hearst.com] Sent: Monday, Au

RE: default clinical pipeline: questions about polarity [EXTERNAL]

2017-08-08 Thread Finan, Sean
Hi Chris, Sounds good. Sean -Original Message- From: Chris Hinkle [mailto:hin...@all-turtles.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 6:44 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: default clinical pipeline: questions about polarity [EXTERNAL] Thanks Sean, I was able to achieve what I wa

Re: default clinical pipeline: questions about polarity [EXTERNAL]

2017-08-08 Thread Chris Hinkle
Thanks Sean, I was able to achieve what I wanted by adding the ContextAnnotator to the default clinical pipeline like so: public class Pipeline { public static AggregateBuilder getAggregateBuilder( ) throws Exception { AggregateBuilder builder = new AggregateBuilder( ); buil

RE: default clinical pipeline: questions about polarity [EXTERNAL]

2017-08-08 Thread Finan, Sean
Hi Chris, No, you are not missing anything. The example on the wiki was concocted to display what ctakes should do. There are a few different negation modules (and you can write your own). Using the Assertion module you will not get negated lesions. Using the ContextAnnotator you will. I d

default clinical pipeline: questions about polarity

2017-08-08 Thread Chris Hinkle
Hi cTAKES Team, I've recently started exploring cTAKES and I'm excited about the potential. However, I'm having trouble seeing the results as they're exemplified in the documentation using the example input "The patient underwent a CT Scan in April which did not reveal lesions in his liver." Spec