>It would have two completely different applications: a superior way of
finding the values of findings and a way of validating/pruning the polarity
status of concepts that are in an semi-grammatical or improperly punctuated
sentence
-- Cool. I expect to see it by end of business tomorrow.
...
For Peter and Jeff:
> are the vocabulary & tui selections that one finds as defaults in the
> dictionary creator something set by the creator as a ctakes optimization
-- Good question, and the answer is "no." Those vocabularies and semantic
types were chosen simply because they contain
Many thanks Sean and Jeff. You guys must be both on the East Coast, because my
coffee has only just kicked in enough to digest your lucid replies. Super
helpful information. It sounds like the quick and dirty solution is to rebuild
the dictionary without the OMIM and MTH vocabularies. So
Hi Peter and Sean,
I recently created a dictionary based off of UMLS 2020AA and did not see
'bed' or 'soft' mapped as synonyms to those terms in my .script file. They
are there, but mapped to other cuis (for example, the cui for an actual bed
from SNOMED). I think the difference is that I select
Hi Peter,
I would guess that you are seeing things like "SOFT" because you new dictionary
has a vocabulary that was not included in sno_rx_16ab.
I don't remember if OMIM (which has the 'SOFT' synonym) was included in
sno_rx_16ab. Probably not, omim is a more -specialized- vocabulary for
