Good information to know. Thanks Kean.
Peter
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 4:47 PM Kean Kaufmann wrote:
> Yes, but that way you can't get the SNOMED code if you need it - the code
>> becomes a custom vocabulary item.
>
>
> Not if you hang it off an existing UMLS CUI and integrate the
> BsvRareWordDi
>
> Yes, but that way you can't get the SNOMED code if you need it - the code
> becomes a custom vocabulary item.
Not if you hang it off an existing UMLS CUI and integrate the
BsvRareWordDictionary and the UmlsJdbcRareWordDictionary using
. Don't recall exactly where this is in the Fast
Diction
Monogyiou | NTT Data UK
Consulting & IT Solutions Ltd. 1 Royal Exchange, London EC3V 3DG
Mob: +44 (0)7971623683 Email: eugenia.monogy...@nttdata.com
-Original Message-
From: Kean Kaufmann
Sent: 15 February 2021 15:17
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dictionary "bad" codes
HI Kean
Yes, but that way you can't get the SNOMED code if you need it - the code
becomes a custom vocabulary item. Adding a synonym gets you the real
linkage. I do use the BSV for concepts that are not in the script file at
all.
I don't "edit" the HSQL file per se. I have a parallel SED script
FWIW, rather than editing the HSQLDB script, we use Sean's
BsvRareWordDictionary to add phrases with a BSV file:
cTakesHsql.xml:
AddPhrases
org.apache.ctakes.dictionary.lookup2.dictionary.BsvRareWordDictionary
eter Abramowitsch
Sent: 15 February 2021 15:09
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dictionary "bad" codes
Hi Eugenia
There may be better ways to do this, but I would insert these as Synonyms in
the CUI_TERMS table. The concept is already there:
insert this:
INSERT INTO CU
Hi Eugenia
There may be better ways to do this, but I would insert these as Synonyms
in the CUI_TERMS table. The concept is already there:
insert this:
INSERT INTO CUI_TERMS VALUES(1303258,0,1,'stemi','stemi')
the concept is already declared here
INSERT INTO PREFTERM VALUES(1303258,'Acute ST seg
Hello,
Peter we had a discussion quite some time ago about additions and removals that
would result into a good dictionary. I have a specific example I would ask for
your help please (or anyone else that has an idea :) )
So STEMI and NSTEMI are correctly annotated but "Code" and "Coding Scheme"
