RE: Offline access

2016-05-16 Thread Finan, Sean
:john.travis.gr...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 11:36 AM Cc: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Offline access It seems odd they would require repeated checke when you can download the whole thing for input into a db with mmsys.  How is the documentation on building the fast lookup from a lo

Re: Offline access

2016-05-16 Thread John Travis Green
abase that was not created using the > UMLS as a source. > > Sean > > -Original Message----- > From: Geise, Brandon D. [mailto:bdge...@geisinger.edu] > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 8:01 AM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: RE: Offline access &

Re: Offline access

2016-05-16 Thread Pei Chen
t was not created using the > UMLS as a source. > > Sean > > -Original Message- > From: Geise, Brandon D. [mailto:bdge...@geisinger.edu] > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 8:01 AM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: RE: Offline access > > I haven't tried i

RE: Offline access

2016-05-16 Thread Finan, Sean
Geise, Brandon D. [mailto:bdge...@geisinger.edu] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 8:01 AM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: RE: Offline access I haven't tried it and is a guess based on reading the code, but you might be able to change the dictionary implementation name in the xml file

RE: Offline access

2016-05-16 Thread Geise, Brandon D.
mothy [mailto:timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu] Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 2:28 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Offline access Well, before we had online verification ctakes required downloading umls, extracting the right subset, and building a database for the dictionary tool.

Re: Offline access

2016-05-14 Thread Miller, Timothy
his is true? If he builds his own dictionary (with the same subsets) can he skip the online verification? Thanks Tim From: John Travis Green Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 10:12 AM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Offline access I have a dod use case that r

Offline access

2016-05-14 Thread John Travis Green
I have a dod use case that requires offline umls verification. Anyone accomplish this yet? I recall some chatter awhile back but initial flirtations with google were unsuccessful. thanks!John