Hi John,
I was away for a little bit and finally got a chance to catch up on emails...
> 2) I work for the DoD and have latched on to several IRB approved projects
> within that community where Ill be using cTakes, though minimally at first.
> This is just a statement, a bug in the ear of the comm
Thanks for bumping this Pei, it reminds me I meant to respond to it.
The OPQRST does sound like a great ML project. At a glance I might think
a sequence model over sentences (like a CRF) would be a good model.
But I'm wondering what the end use case is? Is it for teaching OPQRST to
new clinicia
Pei and Tim - Good questions.
The bottom line is that OPQRST is the algorithm that every clinician uses
to characterize the history of a sign, symptom or constellation of
symptoms. Each letter has multiple meanings, but generally they're grouped.
O for onset, was it quick or slow in onset, P for p
A follow up point to the previous email:
Yes Tim: middleware. This is moving beyond just documentation toward
diagnosis and action, which I suppose is a hidden assumption here - maybe
the cTakes community doesnt care at this point, based on history or
physical exam/labs. However, a common quote in
@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:02 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sundry
Pei and Tim - Good questions.
The bottom line is that OPQRST is the algorithm that every clinician uses
to characterize the history of a sign, symptom or constellation of
symptoms. Each letter has multip
c/articles/PMC2655994/
> It discusses the use of nlp to create something like a problem list.
>
> Sean
>
>
>
>
> From: John Green [john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:02 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.or
/articles/PMC2655994/
> It discusses the use of nlp to create something like a problem list.
> Sean
>
> From: John Green [john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:02 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re
ean
>> ____________
>> From: John Green [john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:02 PM
>> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Sundry
>> Pei and Tim - Good questions.
>> The bottom line is that
n
>
>
>
>
> From: John Green [john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:02 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sundry
>
> Pei and Tim - Good questions.
>
> The bottom line is that OPQRST is the
Sean
From: John Green [john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 7:26 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: RE: Sundry; Problem Lists
Last point: I seem to be interested in a current encounter (the now) and
diagnosis, the article seems to be interested in an arguably ju
rking back from the known natural history of diseases would possibly be a
>route to a solution.
Now that is a challenge!
Cheers for the inspiration and enthusiasm,
Sean
From: John Green [john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 10:45 AM
To: Fin
is probably well known stuff
> Bad assumption ... insert emoticon here ...
>
> >working back from the known natural history of diseases would possibly
> be a route to a solution.
> Now that is a challenge!
>
> Cheers for the inspiration and enthusiasm,
> Sean
>
>
>
n [mailto:john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 5:30 PM
To: Finan, Sean
Cc: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sundry; Problem Lists
Thank you Sean for taking the time to respond to me, it was much appreciated.
I'm learning a lot about a lot.
>I briefly discussed the
outside the domain.
> I hope that I am starting to get on the same page, and I am enjoying this
> chat - it is different from my normal engagements, which is always nice.
> Cheers,
> Sean
> From: John Green [mailto:john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 5
14 matches
Mail list logo
