Hello All,
I'd like to contribute ytex to ctakes. YTEX's main feature is the
ability to store *any* ctakes (or uima) annotation in a relational
database (in a relational format), and the ability to export these
annotations to ML packages (weka, libsvm, matlab, R). All of this is
purely declarati
vj,
This sounds like a really nice contribution to cTAKES. The license[1]
incompatibility may pose a challenge though:
For example, how tightly coupled is weka to the annotator code?
On Hibernate, I've seen other apache projects [2,3] interface with
Hibernate, so we can probably do something simi
This sounds wonderful, Vijay!
But yes, there will probably be an issue with Hibernate and Weka. What's
the best course of action, anyone?
stephen
On 10/3/13 7:50 AM, "vijay garla" wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>I'd like to contribute ytex to ctakes. YTEX's main feature is the
>ability to store *any*
I use hibernate for database independence wrt blob/clob handling and
identifier generation (major differences between databases here). The
hibernate use is minimal, and I would be open to using something that
is apache license conformant (suggestions?) However, this might be a
moot point based on
10:52 AM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: move ytex annotators to ctakes.apache.org?
>
> I use hibernate for database independence wrt blob/clob handling and
> identifier generation (major differences between databases here). The
> hibernate use is minimal, and I would
This would be quite valuable -- in particular, ytex's annotation database
connection is much easier to use than what ships with cTAKES. There are a
fair number of other advantages, and I think they'd all be very valuable!
--
Karthik Sarma
UCLA Medical Scientist Training Program Class of 20??
M
Looking forward to having ytex integrated within cTAKES!
-Original Message-
From: ksa...@gmail.com [mailto:ksa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Karthik Sarma
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 12:04 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: move ytex annotators to ctakes.apache.org?
This would
1:05 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: move ytex annotators to ctakes.apache.org?
>
> This would be quite valuable -- in particular, ytex's annotation database
> connection is much easier to use than what ships with cTAKES. There are a
> fair number of other advanta
ksa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Karthik
>> Sarma
>> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 1:05 PM
>> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: move ytex annotators to ctakes.apache.org?
>>
>> This would be quite valuable -- in particular, ytex's annotation database
>&g
t; >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: ksa...@gmail.com [mailto:ksa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Karthik
> >> Sarma
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 1:05 PM
> >> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: move ytex annotators to ctakes
.com/content/20/5/882.long
> >
> >
> > -vj
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Chen, Pei
> > wrote:
> > > vj,
> > > Were you thinking of contributing the new ytext Word Sense
> > Disambiguation component as well- I think that w
; its own. If that is possible as part of ctakes, I'd love to move it.
> > > If not, I'd leave the semantic similarity and the associated WSD
> > > annotator on google code.
> > >
> > > For those of you who want the back story:
> > > http://www.b
ay, October 21, 2013 7:03 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: move ytex annotators to ctakes.apache.org?
>
> More questions:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Pei Chen wrote:
>
> > Hi Vijay,
> > This is awesome. Some ideas inline below:
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
