[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-17 Thread John Vines (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15826800#comment-15826800 ] John Vines commented on CURATOR-171: I'm okay with this > LeaderLatch isn't aware if

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-17 Thread Scott Blum (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15826685#comment-15826685 ] Scott Blum commented on CURATOR-171: I think he's saying, the leader can talk to ZK (

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-17 Thread Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15826689#comment-15826689 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on CURATOR-171: -- Curator supports revokable locks. (s

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-17 Thread Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15826607#comment-15826607 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on CURATOR-171: -- "the leader will keep being the lead

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-17 Thread John Vines (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15826594#comment-15826594 ] John Vines commented on CURATOR-171: So, my case is in the event of a network partiti

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-16 Thread Scott Blum (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15824551#comment-15824551 ] Scott Blum commented on CURATOR-171: I could totally get on board with the idea that

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-16 Thread Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15823946#comment-15823946 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on CURATOR-171: -- Yes, non-leader nodes watch one othe

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-16 Thread Parminder Grewal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15823814#comment-15823814 ] Parminder Grewal commented on CURATOR-171: -- [~randgalt] While i understand that

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-15 Thread Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15823126#comment-15823126 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on CURATOR-171: -- FYI - I've added persistent recursiv

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-14 Thread Scott Blum (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15822946#comment-15822946 ] Scott Blum commented on CURATOR-171: For what it's worth (this isn't a Curator issue)

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-13 Thread Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15822373#comment-15822373 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on CURATOR-171: -- The leader latch has never watched i

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-13 Thread John Vines (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15822202#comment-15822202 ] John Vines commented on CURATOR-171: I would expect if the ephemeral latch node were

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-13 Thread Tsuyoshi Ozawa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15821815#comment-15821815 ] Tsuyoshi Ozawa commented on CURATOR-171: [~vines] [~psgrewa...@gmail.com] Thanks

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-13 Thread Tsuyoshi Ozawa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15821528#comment-15821528 ] Tsuyoshi Ozawa commented on CURATOR-171: The latch code handles connection loss /

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2017-01-12 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15820570#comment-15820570 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CURATOR-171: GitHub user oza opened a pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-171) LeaderLatch isn't aware if it's own ephemeral node goes away

2016-10-05 Thread Parminder Grewal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15549876#comment-15549876 ] Parminder Grewal commented on CURATOR-171: -- Is this an issue actively worked on?