I got swamped. I'll get there eventually.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> The recent change of possible relevance is to make asynchronous operations
> against the simulated browser be really asynchronous.
>
> This particular test is the one I labored
On Thursday 07 August 2008 7:34:49 am Benson Margulies wrote:
> I got swamped. I'll get there eventually.
No problem. I through a System.gc() in there and the problem became much
less apparent so it isn't bothing me as much. :-) Maybe 10% from top
level. It's probably not really related t
I'm having trouble with the CXF policy framework, which is causing a
little bit of grief. I think this is a developer, as opposed to a
user issue, as I /think/ it points to a bug in the policy framework.
If not, I can migrate the conversation to the users list.
What I'm finding is that
Fred Dushin-3 wrote:
>
> But regardless, should the effective policy on the response be the
> same as the effective policy on the request? Or should policy
> assertion implementors code their interceptors to handle the response
> chain, as well as the request?
>
Does WS-SecurityPolicy h
