Re: The lesser of two JAXB weavils

2009-03-26 Thread Benson Margulies
Reading the code of JAXB, I see that it purports to accept a customization with no schemaLocation, so I tried just removing the code in CustomizationParser that forced in the wsdlURL. Now JAXB complains on this case (testReuseJabBindingFile) that the XPath doesn't find anything. Perhaps the case is

The lesser of two JAXB weavils

2009-03-26 Thread Benson Margulies
Consider CodeGenBugTest.testReuseJabBindingFile1. This is a jaxb binding customization file with no schemaLocation at all. So we substitute the wsdl location. And, in the code as currently on trunk, all the wsdl files are 'keyed' by the wsdl URL, not the schema URL. If I cause files to be keyed b

Re: Apache CXF 2.0.10 WSDL2JAVA creates source that doesn't compile

2009-03-26 Thread Daniel Kulp
You've definitely hit a bug. Can you file a JIRA and attach the wsdl's so I don't forget about it? Thanks! Dan On Thu March 26 2009 3:26:25 pm Tyler Wilson wrote: > Here's the new set. (I just changed the names of the porttypedef > files.) > > While I can generate the source code, it fails t

Re: Working towards a DOSGi 1.0 release

2009-03-26 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi David I agree. CXF 2.2.1 should not be far away - perhaps in 4 weeks or 5 weeks but with the TCK work 'looming' I'd probably not want to ask you to postpone a release and find myself telling you later on ' I won't make it :-)'. DOSGI users do need a release so I agree with what you suggested

Re: Working towards a DOSGi 1.0 release

2009-03-26 Thread davidb
Great to hear about the JAXRS component for DOSGi, Sergey! What is the expected release timeframe of CXF 2.2.1? If its a bit further out, why not do a DOSGi 1.0 release based on CXF 2.2 and then do another 1.1 release with the JAXRS stuff as soon as 2.2.1 is out? Cheers, David 2009/3/26 Sergey

RE: Apache CXF 2.0.10 WSDL2JAVA creates source that doesn't compile

2009-03-26 Thread Tyler Wilson
Here's the new set. (I just changed the names of the porttypedef files.) While I can generate the source code, it fails to compile in JBuilder with the following errors (both using jdk 1.5 and 1.6): "package-info.java": Source D:\TylerJProjects\WS-NotificationClient\src\org\apache\cxf\ws\address

Re: wsdl2java<-->XJC "Options" being passed to SchemaCompiler does not seem to have effect

2009-03-26 Thread Benson Margulies
Further complexity is the binding files. Binding files have schemaLocation attributes. JAXB does not resolve those. We can pre-resolve those, in fact, my not-yet-checked in attempt does so. My view of the big picture is this. We currently, precariously, arrange consistent behavior from wsdl4j read

Re: wsdl2java<-->XJC "Options" being passed to SchemaCompiler does not seem to have effect

2009-03-26 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tue March 24 2009 11:33:04 am Rao, Sameer V wrote: > I was looking at the JAXBDataBinding class > (cxf-tools-wsdlto-databinding-jaxb) and was not sure of the following- > > 1. We are building Options used by SchemaCompiler and calling its > parseArgument(). However, values passed through that ar

Re: bus-extension.xml versus cxf-extension.xml

2009-03-26 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Sat March 21 2009 1:16:00 pm Benson Margulies wrote: > Is it my imagination, or is bus-extension.xml obsolete? No. It's used by the non-spring bus to load stuff. Without it, everything would require spring for all use cases. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Re: Apache CXF 2.0.10 WSDL2JAVA creates source that doesn't compile

2009-03-26 Thread Daniel Kulp
The wsdl's did not survive the Apache filters. I did find them in the pre- moderated emails though. In THAT case, the issue is that the porttypedef.wsdl file defines the porttype for: portType name="NotificationBroker" but the CreatePullPoint.wsdl is looking for: type="wsntw:CreatePullPoi

Re: Working towards a DOSGi 1.0 release

2009-03-26 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi, I'm quite keen to emded a JAXRS component into DOSGI as I reckon we now have all the pieces in place (proxy based client api support, and Benson's Aegis provider) so it should, fingers crossed, be a fairly straighforward exercise - but then you never know what could actually happen at the d

Re: Working towards a DOSGi 1.0 release

2009-03-26 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Hi David, On the general point, I definitely agree that we need to be thinking about a 1.0 release. On the specifics ... > * We need to make sure that all the API's we are using are exactly > correct with the lasted RFC 119 version, e.g. I think we need to add > something to the ServicePublicati

Working towards a DOSGi 1.0 release

2009-03-26 Thread davidb
Hi all, Since CXF 2.2 is out now I was thinking about what work needs to be done for a DOSGi 1.0 release. I've just updated the poms to depend on CXF 2.2, but there's still a few things to do... * there is CXF-1966. It would be good to get a solution to this. I heard that Spring-DM 1.2.0 is goin