Hi
On 12/10/11 21:34, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
thanks for this reply,
i use cxf through OpenEJB and the version is the 2.4.1, do you know if it
was already included?
There was only one relevant fix after 2.4.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3608
If you have in 2.4.1
class
it doesn't seem to work, maybe because the type is not matching:
/foo/123
/foo/{id}
here id and 123 are long so it works but
/foo/{id}
/foo/bar
here id and bar have different types so it doesn't match.
am i wrong?
- Romain
2011/10/13 Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com
Hi
On 12/10/11
It does not work with 2.4.2 ?
Can you also send me the signature of the 2 methods ?
cheers, Sergey
On 13/10/11 16:46, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
it doesn't seem to work, maybe because the type is not matching:
/foo/123
/foo/{id}
here id and 123 are long so it works but
/foo/{id}
/foo/bar
I tried 2.4.3.
Signature 1 foo()
Signature 2 foo(Long l)
- Romain
Le 13 oct. 2011 17:55, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com a écrit :
It does not work with 2.4.2 ?
Can you also send me the signature of the 2 methods ?
cheers, Sergey
On 13/10/11 16:46, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
it
Give me the complete info please: @PathParam, HTTP verb present on both
methods or not, @Consumes/@Produces,
I'm assuming it is @Path(/foo/bar) for foo() and @Path(/foo/{id})
for foo(Lomg l)
On 13/10/11 17:01, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
I tried 2.4.3.
Signature 1 foo()
Signature 2 foo(Long l)
sorry,
it is:
@GET @Path(/bar) String foo()
and
@GET @Path(/{id}) String foo(@PathParam(id}) Long id)
and the parent has the annotation @Path(/foo). I tried with some @Produces
to specify plain text or xml media type but the error is the same. There is
no consume (so no filtering at this level).
Hi
Have a look at these revisions:
trunk: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1183107view=rev
2.4.4-SNAPSHOT: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1183113view=rev
It just works. So I'm wondering, if it the fact that the invocation is
going through OpenEJB integration layer that makes a difference ?
yep in 2.4.3 it works (i think the snapshot was not deployed last time)
sorry the my last useless mail and thank you very much for your time
- Romain
2011/10/13 Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com
Hi
Have a look at these revisions:
trunk: