+1
Colm.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Willem Jiang willem.ji...@gmail.com wrote:
I tests these three version of CXF with camel-cxf 2.7.x, 2.8.x and 2.9.x.
Everything looks good.
Here is my +1.
Willem
On 12/16/11 4:37 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 75 issues since
+1
Freeman
On 2011-12-16, at 上午4:37, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.5.0 and thus is time for a
release.
We've also ported back over 40 of the fixes to 2.4.5 and 30 of those
to 2.3.8.
List of issues:
2.3.8:
+1
Aki
2011/12/15 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.5.0 and thus is time for a release.
We've also ported back over 40 of the fixes to 2.4.5 and 30 of those to 2.3.8.
List of issues:
2.3.8:
+1,
-- Ulhas Bhole
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.5.0 and thus is time for a release.
We've also ported back over 40 of the fixes to 2.4.5 and 30 of those to
2.3.8.
List of issues:
2.3.8:
Hi
I'm seeing these messages in the last few builds:
[JENKINS] Archiving
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/CXF-DOSGi/trunk/distribution/single-bundle/target/cxf-dosgi-ri-singlebundle-distribution-1.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
to
Actually the last one passed
On 16/12/11 09:35, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi
I'm seeing these messages in the last few builds:
[JENKINS] Archiving
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/CXF-DOSGi/trunk/distribution/single-bundle/target/cxf-dosgi-ri-singlebundle-distribution-1.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
to
Hi Sergey,
I've uploaded the final version (for now) to CXF-3859. I've bumped up the
version to 2.5.2-SNAPSHOT and commented out the Apache Snapshot repository.
Hopefully, this meets the quality bar for commit :-)
I did investigate creating the JAXRSServerFactoryBean directly (instead of
I would be inclined to disagree as well due to the following...
1) Complications in an OSGI world. The OSGI runtime is unlikely to export
com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.resolver.* for usage.
2) Not all JVMs could have this package. In particular, I'm thinking about
the IBM JDK.
-kl
On Thu, Dec
Hello,
I'm sorry - I should've put it into 2.5.1 - but it will definitely make
it into 2.5.2 - and I hope it would be of interest to users.
No worries Sergey. Thanks for all your helpful suggestions and guidance
while I worked on this in 2 week spurts.
It took us countless hours and much
