Re: General security error (Provided SAML token does not contain a suitable key)

2012-01-04 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
What does the WSDL of the service look like? Does it have a SecureConversationToken policy? Colm. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:02 PM, danlee100 danlee1...@yahoo.com wrote: Here is the actual SOAP message POST http://66.211.102.200/gen4/services/AssessmentDataService HTTP/1.1 Content-Type:

Re: General security error (Provided SAML token does not contain a suitable key)

2012-01-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tuesday, January 03, 2012 1:17:15 PM danlee100 wrote: After I upgraded CXF to 2.5.1, I am getting another error. It seems that RequestSecurityToken is not recognized. This looks like a SecureConversation request.Does the wsdl define a ws- secureconverstation policy? Also, what cxf jars

Re: General security error (Provided SAML token does not contain a suitable key)

2012-01-04 Thread Amir Bahramian
Could I ask a question. Does cxf support server side ws-secureconversation (+ ws-trust)? Does it interoperate with WCF? I found something in source repository but not in binary. Is there any document explaining how I can use it on server side? Thanks in advance. On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:24 AM,

Re: Initial WS-Federation support commited to sandbox

2012-01-04 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi Oli, Is there a reason why the IDP STS (and the IDP) deploys to Tomcat on port 9080 instead of 8080? It uses 8080 for the commented out plugin. What do you think about this? It's pretty cool from a security POV. Do you have any plans to look at supporting the Federation Metadata document?

Re: Start the 2.5.x_fixes branch, trunk to 2.6.0?

2012-01-04 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi On 04/01/12 20:53, Daniel Kulp wrote: Now that 2.5.1 is out, I like to create the 2.5.x_fixes branch and change trunk to target 2.6.0. Any objections? If not, I'll do so tomorrow. I'd like to start working on a few things for 2.6.x: 1) Individual OSGi bundles (when possible, sent a