Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-28 Thread David Bosschaert
Sounds good, Sergey. I'm all for releasing frequently. One of the things that I think would be good to tackle is to migrate to OSGi Blueprint (from of the current Spring-based approach). Is that something that you were thinking of looking at? Cheers, David On 28 May 2012 17:34, Sergey

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-28 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi David On 28/05/12 18:09, David Bosschaert wrote: Sounds good, Sergey. I'm all for releasing frequently. One of the things that I think would be good to tackle is to migrate to OSGi Blueprint (from of the current Spring-based approach). Is that something that you were thinking of looking at?

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-28 Thread David Bosschaert
I can understand that it's a significant refactoring. If you stay within the pure Blueprint model (within the spec) you shouldn't get bound to Aries. Eclipse Gemini also has an implementation. Cheers, David On 28 May 2012 18:17, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David On

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-28 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
On 28/05/12 18:35, David Bosschaert wrote: I can understand that it's a significant refactoring. If you stay within the pure Blueprint model (within the spec) you shouldn't get bound to Aries. Eclipse Gemini also has an implementation. Sure and there was a proposal on how to get Gemini used

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-28 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
FYI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-115 The proposed fix will probably work with Gemini straight away :-) Sergey On 28/05/12 18:45, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: On 28/05/12 18:35, David Bosschaert wrote: I can understand that it's a significant refactoring. If you stay within the