On 13/07/12 18:35, Aki Yoshida wrote:
Hi,
I just submitted the code with CXF-4423 into trunk. Currently, it has
only the spring support and the blueprint support is to follow.
Basically, you can do something like:
<bean id="keyManagers" .../>
<bean id="trustManagers" .../>
<http:conduit
name="{http://apache.org/hello_world}HelloWorld.http-conduit";>
<http:tlsClientParameters>
<sec:keyManagers ref="keyManagers"/>
<sec:trustManagers ref="trustManagers"/>
<sec:cipherSuitesFilter>
...
Is this syntax okay? Alternatively, we could add the keyMangersRef and
trustMangersRef attributes within tlsClientParameters and not use the
keyManagers and trustManagers elements in this case. But I thought the
ref attribute within the keyManagers/trustManagers elements didn't
look bad.
IMHO it looks fine, I guess the individual stores can be represented as
bean references too if required
Sergey
regards, aki
2012/7/6 Freeman Fang<freeman.f...@gmail.com>:
Sounds good to me, +1
Freeman
On 2012-7-5, at 下午10:28, Willem Jiang wrote:
+1，it makes our life easier to share the security parameter beans across
the http conduit.
On Thu Jul 5 19:09:57 2012, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Aki,
On 05/07/12 11:58, Aki Yoshida wrote:
2012/7/5 Sergey Beryozkin<sberyoz...@gmail.com>:
Hi Aki
On 04/07/12 11:59, Aki Yoshida wrote:
Hi,
I haven been wondering about this for a while and I would like to hear
your thoughts.
Concretely, I am wondering if people are happy with the current file
or resource based keystore instantiation provided by the
tlsClientParameters's configuration schema. The current schema does
not allow any bean referencing from within that structure. So, using
the http's spring or blueprint namespace handlers that are based on
this schema, you need to configure this entire structure. This makes
it difficult to use this configuration handler If you have your own
mechanism to get keystores and you can provide it as a bean or
factory-bean reference.
In such cases, one could directly configure the httpConduit and its
tlsClientParameter as beans directly. Unfortunately, this doesn't work
in blueprint because the blueprint bean element does not have the name
attribute that can be used to configure the conduit's matching
pattern. So, this is not practical. Besides, I think it's pain to
configure beans directly when the specific namespace handlers are
available.
So what are the options? Is this an unusual use case? If this is not
an unusual use case, should we add the reference attribute in some of
those elements so that these can be optionally configured separately
and referenced?
Your comments are appreciated.
I've had a chance to deal with tlsClientParameters few days ago,
I've seen
the examples of the references like
<sec:keyStore type="JKS" password="sspass"
url="mtprotocol://mystorejks"/>
Are you thinking of having something like
ref="mybean" ? I guess it makes sense, we'd probably need to have some
interface like KeyResourceStore introduced, sorry if I misunderstood
Hi Sergey,
yes. I was thinking about introducing an optional ref attribute in
some suitable places to do ref="mybean".
Here are some examples.
The current configuration looks like this:
<http:conduit
name="{http://apache.org/hello_world}HelloWorld.http-conduit";>
<http:tlsClientParameters>
<sec:keyManagers keyPassword="password">
<sec:keyStore type="JKS" password="password"
file="my/file/dir/Morpit.jks"/>
</sec:keyManagers>
<sec:trustManagers>
<sec:keyStore type="JKS" password="password"
file="my/file/dir/Truststore.jks"/>
</sec:trustManagers>
...
Depending on where we allow this optional ref attribute, we could have
several variations in referencing.
For example, we could allow this attribute in the root level as in
<http:conduit
name="{http://apache.org/hello_world}HelloWorld.http-conduit";>
<http:tlsClientParameters ref="mytlsbean">
...
In this case, you could configure this bean directly and setting each
of its bean attributes. This may not be very convenient, but it is
simple and does not require any schema changes to its sub components.
or we could allow the ref attribute in the key/trustManagers level,
as in
<http:conduit
name="{http://apache.org/hello_world}HelloWorld.http-conduit";>
<http:tlsClientParameters>
<sec:keyManagers ref="mykeymanagersbean"/>
<sec:trustManagers ref="mytrustmanagersbean"/>
...
or in the keystore level:
<http:conduit
name="{http://apache.org/hello_world}HelloWorld.http-conduit";>
<http:tlsClientParameters>
<sec:keyManagers keyPassword="password">
<sec:keyStore ref="mykeystorebean"/>
...
I would like to hear if people want to have something like these.
IMHO both options look good, +1 from me
Thanks, Sergey
Thanks.
Regards, aki
Cheers, Sergey
Thanks.
Regards, Aki
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
--
Willem
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: willemjiang
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ff...@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
