I am trying to map the different values required by fediz plugin to talk to
our Shibboleth IdP. Any help is much appreciated.
What kind of help are you looking for? Is the Fediz plugin making an
invocation on the Shibboleth IdP that is rejected? If so please post the
exception and we might be
+1 for skipping 2.8 and releasing 3.0 end of this year.
@Sergei: let us to discuss how I could help with 2.0 TCK.
Regards,
Andrei.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: Montag, 25. März 2013 19:19
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Thoughts about a 2.8
Dan's quote: According to the agreements Apache has with Oracle, we really
cannot release code that doesn't pass the TCK (which the 2.0 works would
not).
I'm confused -- Apache FOP, Maven and Tomcat can release whenever they want,
even though none of them even remotely pass the JAX-RS TCK either.
Dan, thanks for the fix, I actually did not include the local CORS
update, sorry
Sergey
On 27/03/13 20:47, dk...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dkulp
Date: Wed Mar 27 17:47:25 2013
New Revision: 1461738
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1461738
Log:
Fix tests by allowing for the null return.
Modified:
Hi Andrei
On 27/03/13 18:24, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
+1 for skipping 2.8 and releasing 3.0 end of this year.
@Sergei: let us to discuss how I could help with 2.0 TCK.
I'm trying to get the server part close enough to be tested against TCK.
There are 3 issues which I'm aware at the moment that
