Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.5/2.6.8 - take 2

2013-05-08 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 Christian Am 08.05.2013 02:57, schrieb Daniel Kulp: We've resolved over 40 issues since 2.7.4. Not a lot, but it includes an OSGi fix that is blocking a Camel issues which may also be causing issues with the ServiceMix release. This also affects CXF 2.6.x which affects Camel 2.10.x/Ser

[Java] JAX-RS with CXF

2013-05-08 Thread ced_benoit
Hi, I wanted a simple webservice JAX-RS and i follow this exemple on url: http://www.javatips.net/blog/2012/10...without-spring I developped this webservice in Eclipse and when I run the server, i have this error: Code :Sélectionner tout - Visualiser dans une fenêtre à part12345678910111213141

Re: Audit log in CXF STS using ApplicationEventPublisher

2013-05-08 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
No objections, better auditing is always good :-) Colm. On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Oliver Wulff wrote: > Hi there > > I'd like to add some kind of audit log in the CXF STS where it's logged > whether an authentication was successful or not with context information > like issue/validate/..

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.5/2.6.8 - take 2

2013-05-08 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Correction, I am only -1 on CXF 2.7.5. This issue does not exist in CXF 2.6.x, so I am +1 on that. Colm. On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > -1. Unfortunately I have discovered another blocker. > > A fix I made to the WSS4JInInterceptor for CXF 2.7.4 to populate the >

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.5/2.6.8 - take 2

2013-05-08 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
-1. Unfortunately I have discovered another blocker. A fix I made to the WSS4JInInterceptor for CXF 2.7.4 to populate the SecurityContext from a JAAS Subject had the side-effect of always choosing the first Principal from the WSS4J result list, whereas the old behaviour was to choose the last. So

Audit log in CXF STS using ApplicationEventPublisher

2013-05-08 Thread Oliver Wulff
Hi there I'd like to add some kind of audit log in the CXF STS where it's logged whether an authentication was successful or not with context information like issue/validate/..., principal, appliesto, The very first implementation could just write a log message to an "AUDIT" logger. Others

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.5/2.6.8 - take 2

2013-05-08 Thread Willem jiang
+1 -- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.5/2.6.8 - take 2

2013-05-08 Thread Aki Yoshida
+1 aki 2013/5/8 Daniel Kulp > > We've resolved over 40 issues since 2.7.4. Not a lot, but it includes an > OSGi fix that is blocking a Camel issues which may also be causing issues > with the ServiceMix release. This also affects CXF 2.6.x which affects > Camel 2.10.x/ServiceMix 4.5.1 so I

RE: Fediz - intended project direction?

2013-05-08 Thread snowch
Hi Oli, That sounds great - this functionality is where I was heading with my questions. Many thanks, Chris -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/RE-Fediz-intended-project-direction-tp5727411p5727416.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: XKMS donation

2013-05-08 Thread Andrei Shakirin
Thanks for support, Dan! Only the things where I am not absolutely sure are W3C WSDL and schemas: xkms.wsdl , xkms.xsd and xmldsig-core-schema.xsd. All other dependencies are JDK, CXF, Spring and Blueprint. Regards, Andrei. > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.o

RE: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.5/2.6.8 - take 2

2013-05-08 Thread Oliver Wulff
+1 Oli From: Alessio Soldano [asold...@redhat.com] Sent: 08 May 2013 09:21 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.5/2.6.8 - take 2 +1 On 05/08/2013 02:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > We've resolved over 40 issues since 2.7.4. Not a lot, but

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.5/2.6.8 - take 2

2013-05-08 Thread Alessio Soldano
+1 On 05/08/2013 02:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > We've resolved over 40 issues since 2.7.4. Not a lot, but it includes an > OSGi fix that is blocking a Camel issues which may also be causing issues > with the ServiceMix release. This also affects CXF 2.6.x which affects Camel > 2.10.x/Serv

RE: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.5/2.6.8 - take 2

2013-05-08 Thread Andrei Shakirin
+1 (non binding) > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2013 02:58 > To: dev@cxf.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.5/2.6.8 - take 2 > > > We've resolved over 40 issues since 2.7.4. Not a lot, but it includes an > OSGi > fix that

RE: Fediz - intended project direction?

2013-05-08 Thread Oliver Wulff
If you don't mind I'd like to move this dicussion to the dev list. Just thinking out loud... the Fediz IDP should become an application but might still require to deploy the WAR into your favorite servlet container. When the new feature (FEDIZ-3) is completed we're close for 1.1.0 release. But