Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.6.16

2014-10-09 Thread Alessio Soldano
+1 On 07/10/14 21:59, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.6.16. This release is JUST to fix the problems running 2.6.15 with Java5. All the changes between 2.6.15 and 2.6.16 are directly related to getting it to build, run, and test with Java5. This does include downgradin

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
The features file would only pull in the opensaml jar/bundle, not the wrong xerces. We don’t use “cxf.opensaml.osgi.version” as a version for any sort of wrote: > I'm sorry to say I have to -1 for both. > > As both CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2 use > 2.6.1_1 > however servicemix wrapped opensaml 2.6

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Oct 9, 2014, at 4:48 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > The features file would only pull in the opensaml jar/bundle, not the wrong > xerces. We don’t use “cxf.opensaml.osgi.version” as a version for any sort > of More importantly, the _2 bundle is completely broken. It’s missing all the *.xml

Re: git commit: [CXF-6040]need use servicemix wrapped opensaml 2.6.1_2

2014-10-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
-1 The 2.6.1_2 bundle is broken. This needs to be reverted. Dan On Oct 9, 2014, at 1:58 AM, ff...@apache.org wrote: > Repository: cxf > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/2.7.x-fixes bfd939ce0 -> b8e305d75 > > > [CXF-6040]need use servicemix wrapped opensaml 2.6.1_2 > > > Project: http://gi

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Freeman Fang
This can cause problem in downstream project like servicemix where use maven-notices-plugin to merge all notices from dependencies in features-repo folder, though not a showstopper for CXF itself. - Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat On 2014-10-9, a

EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF

2014-10-09 Thread Bin Zhu
Hi, Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is there requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for application server? Thanks. Spec for EJB support: In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the use of stateless and single

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Freeman Fang
Ok, seems we need another _3 bundle to fix the problems you point out, create SMX4-1877[1] to track it. As I said in another mail, as this wrong dependency isn't a showstoper for CXF itself and so I will revert change and won't block CXF release [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-18

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 to both Christian On 08.10.2014 19:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA issues resolved for 3.0.2 which is a lot. Tags: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=3ec631c97e9eccf62490b176aab61044b3b9ab9f https://git

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > +1 to both > > Christian > > On 08.10.2014 19:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA >> issues resolved for 3.0.2 which is a lot. >> >

WS policy alternative selector based on a particular operation in a client

2014-10-09 Thread Jason Pell
For instance I want to force choosing username password token for one method call and then a saml bearer token for all others. I don't have enough info in the assertor http conduit

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Andrey Redko
+1! Andriy On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > +1. > > Colm. > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Christian Schneider < > ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > > > +1 to both > > > > Christian > > > > On 08.10.2014 19:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > >> This is a vote to releas

Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF

2014-10-09 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote: Hi, Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is there requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for application server? Thanks. Spec for EJB support: In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST

Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF

2014-10-09 Thread Andrey Redko
Hi, Following Sergey's e-mail, it is true, CXF does not have support for EJB resource classes yet. The work has been done to support CDI 1.1. That's being said, if the EJB container integrates with CDI container (it should), the CXF can be used and is going to work as expected. Thanks. Best Re

RE: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Andrei Shakirin
+1, Andrei. > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2014 19:31 > To: dev@cxf.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2 > > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA > issues > resolved for 3.0

Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF

2014-10-09 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Hi, Yes absolutely. TomEE supports CDI rest endpoints but also EJB endpoints. Both are integrated and work together out of the box in TomEE. Happy to hack on an hello world sample for you if you want. jean Louis Hi, Following Sergey's e-mail, it is true, CXF does not have support for EJB reso

Re: WS policy alternative selector based on a particular operation in a client

2014-10-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Oct 9, 2014, at 5:41 AM, Jason Pell wrote: > For instance I want to force choosing username password token for one > method call and then a saml bearer token for all others. > > I don't have enough info in the assertor http conduit In the AlternativeSelector for CXF 3.0.x, we added the Mess

Re: WS policy alternative selector based on a particular operation in a client

2014-10-09 Thread Jason Pell
I can't upgrade to 3.x as yet. So I need to figure out a way to do this in 2.7. On 10/10/2014 4:18 AM, "Daniel Kulp" wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2014, at 5:41 AM, Jason Pell wrote: > > > For instance I want to force choosing username password token for one > > method call and then a saml bearer token f

Re: WS policy alternative selector based on a particular operation in a client

2014-10-09 Thread Jason Pell
I came up with a really dodgy solution that actually works :-) https://github.com/pellcorp/cxf/blob/master/JavaFirst/src/main/java/com/pellcorp/client/HttpsConduitAlternativeSelector.java I loaded up a list of all jaxws clients. I used reflection to get hold of the endpoint info from the conduit