Re: xkms test failures

2014-11-27 Thread Aki Yoshida
I think you have another karaf instance running on your box. Exception in thread JMX Connector Thread [service:jmx:rmi://0.0.0.0:4/jndi/rmi://0.0.0.0:1099/karaf-root] java.lang.RuntimeException: Port already in use: 4; 2014-11-27 3:28 GMT+01:00 Jim Ma mail2ji...@gmail.com: Hi, Does

Two different tests for isRequestor??

2014-11-27 Thread Jason Pell
Hi All Was wondering if anyone knows why in AbstractOutDatabindingInterceptor, isRequestorRole has a definition of: protected boolean isRequestor(Message message) { return Boolean.TRUE.equals(message.containsKey(Message.REQUESTOR_ROLE)); } Whereas in AbstractInDatabindingInterceptor

Re: Two different tests for isRequestor??

2014-11-27 Thread Aki Yoshida
I didn't know there are so many isRequest methods hiding in the code ;-) I knew only MessageUtils's one, which was probably added later after some time. The inconsistency that you observed between AbstractInDatabindingIntereceptor and AbstractOutDatabindingIntereceptor was the result of this

Re: Two different tests for isRequestor?

2014-11-27 Thread Jason Pell
I will take care of that while finishing up CXF 6118. regards On 28/11/2014 12:37 AM, Aki Yoshida elak...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't know there are so many isRequest methods hiding in the code ;-) I knew only MessageUtils's one, which was probably added later after some time. The

Re: [Proposal] WS-Transfer/WS-Fragment implementation

2014-11-27 Thread dudae
FIX: Document about implementation details is here https://developer.jboss.org/docs/DOC-52429?uniqueTitle=false -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Proposal-WS-Transfer-WS-Fragment-implementation-tp5750975p5751577.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at