On 01/12/2015 20:59, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
Hi Francesco,
I am really happy to see you in our team!
Thanks Andrei!
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: Samstag, 28. November 2015 11:31
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Introducing
Hi Francesco,
I am really happy to see you in our team!
Regards,
Andrei.
> -Original Message-
> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
> Sent: Samstag, 28. November 2015 11:31
> To: dev@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: Introducing myself
>
> Hi all,
> just a quick e-mail to
Thanks, I got it to work with a custom interceptor.
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Question-on-wsu-id-attribute-added-to-outgoing-request-tp5763408p5763457.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
No. However you could easily write a custom interceptor to grab the
security header from the outgoing request + add one.
Colm.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:09 PM, dthomas wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response.That makes sense.
>
> The timestamp is not signed. You mentioned that the wsu:id is not a
Thanks for the quick response.That makes sense.
The timestamp is not signed. You mentioned that the wsu:id is not added by
default, is there an option to change the default behaviour and force adding
the wsu:id?
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Question-on-wsu-i
Are you signing the Timestamp? If so then a wsu:Id should be added, as a
way of referencing the Timestamp. If not then it won't add the wsu:Id by
default, as it is not required.
Colm.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:31 PM, dthomas wrote:
> I have also tried CXF 2.7.0 + Wss4j 1.6.18 and ran into the
Github user ilgrosso commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/100#issuecomment-160935888
Merged as
*
https://github.com/apache/cxf/commit/3ff04d2b458b867ea6437a7ed9949d834b16e346
*
https://github.com/apache/cxf/commit/cc591f4a3b205a5dae58cadb798
Github user ilgrosso closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/100
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user ilgrosso commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/100#issuecomment-160921994
Jenkins keeps failing, but failures don't seem to be related in any way
with the changes contained here.
Given the discussion at swagger-api/swagger-core#1558 I am
