Re: Moving CXF SwaggerFeature into its own module

2016-07-04 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi Andriy Romain proposed it earlier, I agree it is quite timely at this stage :-) Cheers, Sergey On 04/07/16 15:53, Andrey Redko wrote: Hey Sergey, Great idea I think, we may add even more features around Swagger, awesome timing for that. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Jul 4

Re: Moving CXF SwaggerFeature into its own module

2016-07-04 Thread Andrey Redko
Hey Sergey, Great idea I think, we may add even more features around Swagger, awesome timing for that. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi All > > as part of CXF-6760 [1] I've moved the Swagger code into its own > cxf-rt-rs-descri

Re: Moving CXF SwaggerFeature into its own module

2016-07-04 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 04/07/2016 16:04, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi Francesco Thanks, FYI, the initial commit only showed that the Swagger resources were deleted :-) Here is the one with the newly added resources: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/commit/636252c2 Whoops :-) On 04/07/16 14:59, Franc

Re: Moving CXF SwaggerFeature into its own module

2016-07-04 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 04/07/2016 15:51, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi All as part of CXF-6760 [1] I've moved the Swagger code into its own cxf-rt-rs-description-swagger module. It makes it easier for the users to choose between WADL and Swagger (example, right now if only WADL is preferred then no Swagger endpoint

Moving CXF SwaggerFeature into its own module

2016-07-04 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi All as part of CXF-6760 [1] I've moved the Swagger code into its own cxf-rt-rs-description-swagger module. It makes it easier for the users to choose between WADL and Swagger (example, right now if only WADL is preferred then no Swagger endpoint is there but not vice versa, having Swagger e