Re: [Discuss] Move spring and blueprint support out of cxf-core

2016-09-29 Thread Guillaume Nodet
But DS provides no extension point and can't really be used to do pure dependency injection. I'd think CDI might be a better goal if we want to support a new framework. Guillaume 2016-09-29 17:07 GMT+02:00 Benson Margulies : > There's more to OSGi than Blueprint. I'd be very happy to use CXF wit

Re: [Discuss] Move spring and blueprint support out of cxf-core

2016-09-29 Thread Benson Margulies
There's more to OSGi than Blueprint. I'd be very happy to use CXF with DS and no blueprint. On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Andrei Shakirin wrote: > Just more detail description: > > After removing the optional spring imports packages from CXF jars Manifests, > the users still can use CXF with

RE: [Discuss] Move spring and blueprint support out of cxf-core

2016-09-29 Thread Andrei Shakirin
Just more detail description: After removing the optional spring imports packages from CXF jars Manifests, the users still can use CXF with Spring in Web, JEE and standalone deployments, but not in OSGi with SpringDM. Removing can be done for example with maven bundle plugin instruction: org