[GitHub] cxf pull request #155: [CXF-7000] Allow logging to be enabled on-the-fly

Github user iweiss closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/155 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Version 3.1.12

Will there be a 3.1.12 early jun? Since last was early April. ..

Re: Issue while upgrading Apache CXF from 3.0.2 to 3.1.11

Ok, thanks. On 26 May 2017 12:55 am, "Daniel Kulp" wrote: > > There are no references to that package anywhere in the CXF code. No > idea where that comes from. Is there more information I the stack trace? > > Dan > > > > On May 25, 2017, at 5:42 AM, suraj bansal

[GitHub] cxf pull request #174: CXF-7075: Improve performance by removing unnecessary...

Github user andymc12 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/174 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cxf issue #218: [CXF-7201] Correctly format UserInfo response when no signat...

Github user deki commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/218 CXF-7201 is resolved so this should be closed as well, shouldn't it? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] cxf issue #174: CXF-7075: Improve performance by removing unnecessary string...

Github user deki commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/174 CXF-7070 and CXF-7075 are resolved so this should be closed as well, shouldn't it? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] cxf issue #155: [CXF-7000] Allow logging to be enabled on-the-fly

Github user deki commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/155 CXF-7000 and CXF-7047 are resolved so this should be closed as well, shouldn't it? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

Issue while upgrading Apache CXF from 3.0.2 to 3.1.11

Hi, I'm upgrading Apache CXF from 3.0.2 to 3.1.11 . i'm using OSGI framework. While upgrading, it's giving below error: * Unresolved requirement: Import-Package: com.beust.jcommander* So just wanted to know, whether Jcommander is added as a dependency in 3.1.11 version. Regards, Suraj