andymc12 opened a new pull request #380: [CXF-7639] Update dependency to
servlet 4.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/380
Updating the Import-Package of javax.servlet.* packages to include 4.0.
This is a small change, but is used in several modules. I'm mainly looking for
an
andymc12 commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364164854
Hi @sberyozkin - that makes sense. I'll update with a new commit shortly.
Thanks!
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364094956
Hmm...May be the registration of the unknown types should not be blocked as
I suspect this is how many users are
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364092698
OK, I've debugged the test and recall a bit better now what I was trying to
do with these supported types. FYI, I
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364092698
OK, I've debugged the test and recall a bit better now what I was trying to
do with these supported types. FYI, I
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364075241
Sorry, looking at the test in this PR which explains the issue...
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364072539
Hi, I was referring to a case where a provider implementing multiple
interfaces has to be registered under a
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364072539
Hi, I was referring to a case where a provider implementing multiple
interfaces has to be registered under a
Hi
Not that I'm aware of; perhaps you need to configure WLS 12.2.1 somehow
to tell it not to use the default JAX-RS stack for your web app...
Sergey
On 08/02/18 09:13, Moshe Lavi (Raanana) wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if there is any known limitation where both CXF 3.0.2 and
WLS 12.2.1
